Received: by 2002:a05:6358:e9c4:b0:b2:91dc:71ab with SMTP id hc4csp5561515rwb; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:16:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7DzERUAC0AMW2xSniumiR1I6AJCu2yi4a+OxPsDUnSikp/hBHalDS0qJLGSjdT9IZSfi/s X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:40cd:b0:43e:5a4c:b5a5 with SMTP id z13-20020a05640240cd00b0043e5a4cb5a5mr20434639edb.154.1660025816640; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 23:16:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660025816; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZXP+zXpyqBGsUc0OGk65gSJUjU4HEBN/XwrtY/2GrKEH1KHKU1/UQ27CnHM1bM1CDH CHieMp3za9JTluoDh5x7GA2DdXOGSTHhq5bJOY3qBV1N6Kx7Ii9qgrS75roYqvM0Deji 69BQjLObxbBKh8/LjD10I/RoclGH4RDQXQNttZcWM7XM2zI2JAw49rngCOk+gkWhs2LZ 34S+5F694Cl2Qjuae5ed6VFhrXAVSoiWWFAep2i41uMTK36tIjTGH7zWc3pT4wvzfJBW xvhk0h/CezQ8OYPXBFxl8A4tXD4gRicOW2l/OMmxvoqf9naJYFujXYscsz23acxn+78W ga0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=E9OzWl18H+GHaCjsWH4b7LkAWECP451J2luF+Hem4as=; b=I1zSgcHJkKv0FmA8TU2A/zlMVU+tLRniqdUYIdMKYFtDjdSWV6KSA3uzs1MnfzItUf vYnv/jo+xZZB1mzjeQN4XdhZGSSzH2W5Oeuw9ARUFYbAOA2wYtJBluO6puKlxZObQKph aSG0dWxGWUHc0Z9g0Ekp2MK/mvr97gtX/stifVa0m+lY1olSakSr4MZdqVQJ4n3ToRzI f30MglL6IIFnHdif7A1YZM8QkCc6LVvLo/V1Eh0QC3V0VpxxVDOs2zcP8FyFMQT6zIZU 99kPwLDMLwmLOxa3vrs6nUAvOrdukzEmC5Fm2wgumMXjdFXpVIWdVuymayVzW9eLldVN 4bPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p14-20020a50cd8e000000b0043be0095146si8258467edi.601.2022.08.08.23.16.31; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 23:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235205AbiHIFrh (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Aug 2022 01:47:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45064 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229606AbiHIFrf (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2022 01:47:35 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85A351BEAD; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 22:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7D32050A; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:47:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pBNKI6Ghzl_T; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:47:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailout1.secunet.com (mailout1.secunet.com [62.96.220.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A26712008D; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:47:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977FB80004A; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:47:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:47:29 +0200 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:47:29 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC732318053D; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:47:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:47:28 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: Herbert Xu CC: Abhishek Shah , , , , , , , Gabriel Ryan , Fan Du , Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_key: Do not call xfrm_probe_algs in parallel Message-ID: <20220809054728.GX2950045@gauss3.secunet.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 06:03:46PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > When namespace support was added to xfrm/afkey, it caused the > previously single-threaded call to xfrm_probe_algs to become > multi-threaded. This is buggy and needs to be fixed with a mutex. > > Reported-by: Abhishek Shah > Fixes: 283bc9f35bbb ("xfrm: Namespacify xfrm state/policy locks") > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Applied, thanks a lot Herbert!