Received: by 2002:a05:6358:e9c4:b0:b2:91dc:71ab with SMTP id hc4csp5574334rwb; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4K8CeB9ntDj3L0AXbSLykN9zKO8TXO4RMztpKvfY9uvcSB6v4oMsMYRoElDcF6Dgb3dcT9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1de7:b0:730:66be:458c with SMTP id og39-20020a1709071de700b0073066be458cmr15752498ejc.730.1660027014293; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660027014; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lQj5YfDkO3UFnKb5bZIk2f9yLwZeuYhqLKRq3zt/IVTCAf4sX9OjG+CYuOITYG857Q u7c0RqOPSqDlan/FAxaChYCVVuvmHAh2KdiJVNUr4IdL9oJsfPbKlboVhEwxJFBYwdH6 jSMwWjPy+57W/eq2aOVGOuVyOY+HkItQOrBXGguyWMLGD4IO+pnhMTPGSYOBghSuJAQ7 GCCiYO4+WkO/huUXfua2CawyFTwgNmqPO+xC8O/WDY1VHMEvnV5aHM1lrhli6FLbqtJ4 7IhKu8dF5APvmn45oOPReJvNL+AhwepZ6sQULQN3dz0uukltmXhPnNvwknHyngcxSngC nlIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=wiHB6xD9Q5AdYRvL7AHA6OTJj98bD0Jg2wNMsviboic=; b=09jdwn8YVFMt0/0GKgnHBVrWe6o4CAW+eNlnLJ2LwPeuwho47gJM6kDWSgiCOp5Ez7 FvYzP7ME+bNTd3Uudu/4pWyMWrLqPO6JvPDewGqe8G6c/5MFcO/gxbQD7HXfCiK4yGp/ 7Vir+jZqcKmX5rp4g61xTc8wFWmtI92N4Hc4CTCkNaU1vVfigiqrPV0xlYu7eCQW78Ok hJprTZzb6IS0nED+/ytAIPNcSWjExcPwebZhu4l6rQtkBt+mQ18gJ0xZo6ayYCYtY4bx 6KyHzaNaZuUzSUjCyHM9gWGZd2IlCGXQEV98xI+/RI1VYUiBELqGAE0vrtfsVgGI4its 2Kow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=LCPo+mC7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f15-20020aa7d84f000000b0043d91e06a6csi7257381eds.197.2022.08.08.23.36.29; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=LCPo+mC7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236324AbiHIGJL (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Aug 2022 02:09:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58474 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236500AbiHIGJF (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2022 02:09:05 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com (lelv0142.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.249]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A0141D32B; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 27968jgW044816; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 01:08:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1660025325; bh=wiHB6xD9Q5AdYRvL7AHA6OTJj98bD0Jg2wNMsviboic=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=LCPo+mC7UbTES/O6NyGnVGaKyeZAsQjipQVoTwYjEZcv+OyUBCUnDHOFUe4ho1731 wMWHqW3zYZ+jFcORYFtDOVy7XbSW7AxShdnd1Cc4WL94izKplEh5cB+Y7eq/Pdl2oF OjurfNfhoPU1MePqTl45jaCC/dWJ9HruL+l4zd1M= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 27968j9U088478 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Aug 2022 01:08:45 -0500 Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 01:08:44 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 01:08:44 -0500 Received: from [172.24.157.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 27968exD088222; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 01:08:41 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:38:40 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/tidss: Add support for AM625 DSS Content-Language: en-US To: Tomi Valkeinen , Jyri Sarha , Rob Herring , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Krzysztof Kozlowski CC: Nishanth Menon , Devicetree List , Vignesh Raghavendra , Devarsh Thakkar , Linux Kernel List , DRI Development List , Rahul T R References: <20220627151200.4693-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com> <20220627151200.4693-3-a-bhatia1@ti.com> <4382b760-418f-4033-97f2-47e082a30232@ideasonboard.com> From: Aradhya Bhatia In-Reply-To: <4382b760-418f-4033-97f2-47e082a30232@ideasonboard.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tomi, On 28-Jul-22 17:34, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 27/06/2022 18:12, Aradhya Bhatia wrote: >> Add support for the DSS IP on TI's new AM625 SoC in the tidss driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia >> Reviewed-by: Rahul T R >> --- >>   drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>   drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.h |  2 ++ >>   drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.c   |  1 + >>   3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c >> index dae47853b728..f084f0688a54 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c >> @@ -272,6 +272,55 @@ const struct dispc_features dispc_j721e_feats = { >>       .vid_order = { 1, 3, 0, 2 }, >>   }; >> +const struct dispc_features dispc_am625_feats = { >> +    .max_pclk_khz = { >> +        [DISPC_VP_DPI] = 165000, >> +        [DISPC_VP_OLDI] = 165000, >> +    }, >> + >> +    .scaling = { >> +        .in_width_max_5tap_rgb = 1280, >> +        .in_width_max_3tap_rgb = 2560, >> +        .in_width_max_5tap_yuv = 2560, >> +        .in_width_max_3tap_yuv = 4096, >> +        .upscale_limit = 16, >> +        .downscale_limit_5tap = 4, >> +        .downscale_limit_3tap = 2, >> +        /* >> +         * The max supported pixel inc value is 255. The value >> +         * of pixel inc is calculated like this: 1+(xinc-1)*bpp. >> +         * The maximum bpp of all formats supported by the HW >> +         * is 8. So the maximum supported xinc value is 32, >> +         * because 1+(32-1)*8 < 255 < 1+(33-1)*4. >> +         */ >> +        .xinc_max = 32, >> +    }, >> + >> +    .subrev = DISPC_AM625, >> + >> +    .common = "common", >> +    .common_regs = tidss_am65x_common_regs, >> + >> +    .num_vps = 2, >> +    .vp_name = { "vp1", "vp2" }, >> +    .ovr_name = { "ovr1", "ovr2" }, >> +    .vpclk_name =  { "vp1", "vp2" }, >> +    .vp_bus_type = { DISPC_VP_OLDI, DISPC_VP_DPI }, > > This looks correct, but with the two OLDI TXes, I think there will be > some interesting issues. > > The tidss_kms.c associates a DSS VP and a DT port, but that's no longer > true if you add the ports for both OLDI TXes, as they both use the same > VP. I think fixing that won't affect this patch, though, and merging > this patch will, afaik, enable similar DSS functionality as we have for > AM65x. > > So, I think these two patches could be merged, or we could wait a bit > until the OLDI situation becomes more clear. Up to you. In any case, for > both patches: > > Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen \ Thank you for the review! This patch set is required for the dss DT patches to be upstreamed for the AM625-SK, so I would like them to get merged. Since these were posted in the previous merge window, I will re-send with your tag. Regards Aradhya