Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937579AbXFGWtx (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:49:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936640AbXFGWtp (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:49:45 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:40674 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932857AbXFGWto (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:49:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 23:54:41 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: David Woodhouse Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used Message-ID: <20070607235441.17dbd5cc@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <1181254517.20322.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> References: <20070523172739.1d3a918c@the-village.bc.nu> <1180012135.8303.89.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070524144109.7bd0f4d0@the-village.bc.nu> <1180014338.8303.95.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070524160559.54c2c639@the-village.bc.nu> <1181133010.4096.26.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070606160310.27d6d3b8@the-village.bc.nu> <1181150998.2785.13.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070607163808.19984208@the-village.bc.nu> <1181231421.2785.68.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070607225528.0d5e7b29@the-village.bc.nu> <1181254517.20322.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.8; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 922 Lines: 22 On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:15:17 +0100 David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 22:55 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Umm if your struct termios has the c_ispeed/c_ospeed fields then you > > don't need to add the new ioctls to the PPC either - the Alpha is the > > same here. > > Well, OK -- if it only involves editing patch files I might _send_ a > patch tonight but I'll _test_ it in the morning... I think we only need > this one hunk of what I sent before. If it doesn't only involve editing the header files for this case (and maybe needing a define to indicate old==new) then the tty layer wants fixing to sort that out. Its on my todo list. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/