Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220808201724.27831-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> <7f87a846-9e00-7fec-45dc-4a1b5004971c@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <7f87a846-9e00-7fec-45dc-4a1b5004971c@linaro.org>
From:   Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:11:21 +0300
Message-ID: <CAPLW+4mtDOGL_mPv3hvVXMpRESK2GzZjS8MynKyhL7aQGHg1EA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: exynos850: Add cmu and sysmmu nodes
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        David Virag <virag.david003@gmail.com>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 10:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2022 23:17, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > Now that all clock domains needed for SysMMUs are implemented [1]
> > (pending), and the basic SysMMU v7 support is ready as well [2], let's
> > add all related CMU and SysMMU nodes to Exynos850 SoC device tree.
> >
> > All those SysMMU instances were tested with "emulated translation"
> > driver [4] on E850-96 board: both the emulated translation and fault
> > handling were verified.
> >
> > This patch series depends on [1], so it must be taken into the account
> > when merging it.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/8/8/752
>
> It should not be sent separately then, unless you are fine waiting
> entire cycle for this to land.
>

Sure, good point. If it's possible to take all those patches in a
single tree. I remember we already had a similar issue previously.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof