Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:58:36 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= <pali@kernel.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: marvell: Update Armada 37xx platform
 bindings
Message-ID: <YvJ2HKqMTTyWiNth@lunn.ch>
References: <20220713200123.22612-1-pali@kernel.org>
 <20220809131252.z3mbmiz4duxwlauw@pali>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20220809131252.z3mbmiz4duxwlauw@pali>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 03:12:52PM +0200, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> + Andrew, Gregory, Sebastian
> 
> please comment on this

Krzysztof said:

> The change is an ABI break, which looks reasonable, but still
> platform maintainer should comment on it. Especially on the aspect
> why the marvell,armada3710 fallback was chosen at the first place.

I was not involved in the armada37xx enablement. I have no idea why
marvell,armada3710 fallback was chosen.

Gregory might know, he is the author of this file.

It does however seem reasonable. And a grep does suggest this
compatible is purely cosmetic, it is not matched on anywhere.

	   Andrew