Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:20:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:20:17 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:17924 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:20:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Coding style - a non-issue To: pavel@suse.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 21:28:00 +0000 (GMT) Cc: hps@intermeta.de (Henning Schmiedehausen), viro@math.psu.edu (Alexander Viro), jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik), lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011202211309.B251@elf.ucw.cz> from "Pavel Machek" at Dec 02, 2001 09:13:09 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > a) media echo that "linux core developers start insulting code > > committers" > > > > b) vendors start cleaning up their code. > > Question is... what hurts us more. Bad press or bad code? I guess bad > code is worse... What would be much much more constructive isnt quite a hall of shame - its to build a set of pages that take problem drivers and quote chunks of them with an explanation of _why_ it is wrong, what should be used instead and possible the "after" code if it also gets cleaned up. That way people coming along actually learn something from it. Anyone can be a critic, its rather harder and much more valuable to be a critic that actually has positive impacts on what you criticize Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/