Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:56:20 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc:     Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@openvz.org,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] enable memcg accounting for kernfs objects
Message-ID: <YvKfxGvg5/J0+QoD@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <0414cab3-32d6-c60a-d3c8-96fc72064ba0@openvz.org>
 <YvKZ8zYJFhhFvRxO@slm.duckdns.org>
 <20220809174934.GC10478@blackbody.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20220809174934.GC10478@blackbody.suse.cz>
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 07:49:34PM +0200, Michal Koutn? wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 07:31:31AM -1000, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure whether following the usual "charge it to the allocating
> > task's cgroup" is the best way to go about it. I wonder whether it'd be
> > better to attach it to the new cgroup's nearest ancestor with memcg enabled.
> 
> See also 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/YnBLge4ZQNbbxufc@blackbook/
> and
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511163439.GD24172@blackbody.suse.cz/

Ah, thanks. Vasily, can you please include some summary of the discussions
and the rationales for the path taken in the commit message?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun