Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <d92dd996-6961-5291-9504-1fe284b40dd6@gmail.com>
References: <20220419051114.1569291-1-seanga2@gmail.com> <d92dd996-6961-5291-9504-1fe284b40dd6@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] clk: ls1c: Fix PLL rate calculation
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@gmail.com>,
        Du Huanpeng <dhu@hodcarrier.org>,
        Yang Ling <gnaygnil@gmail.com>
To:     Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Tue, 09 Aug 2022 11:06:58 -0700
User-Agent: alot/0.10
Message-Id: <20220809180700.BE785C43470@smtp.kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Sean Anderson (2022-08-03 16:28:41)
> On 4/19/22 1:11 AM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >  =20
> >       pll =3D __raw_readl(LS1X_CLK_PLL_FREQ);
> > -     rate =3D ((pll >> 8) & 0xff) + ((pll >> 16) & 0xff);
> > +     rate =3D (pll & 0xff00) + ((pll >> 16) & 0xff);
> >       rate *=3D OSC;
> > -     rate >>=3D 2;
> > +     rate >>=3D 10;
> >  =20
> >       return rate;
> >   }
> >=20
>=20
> Since there have been no objections, can we apply this?
>=20

Can you resend it? I can apply it after the merge window closes next
week.