Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <b723f2a292e92a792df95b912404e8d8e8e5e5f4.camel@svanheule.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] cpumask: UP optimisation fixes follow-up
From:   Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:18:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <YvM6LjJCMK4ZKrxK@yury-laptop>
References: <cover.1660066581.git.sander@svanheule.net>
         <YvM6LjJCMK4ZKrxK@yury-laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4 (3.44.4-1.fc36) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 21:55 -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 07:36:32PM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > As an older version of the UP optimisation fixes was merged, not all
> > review feedback has been implemented.=C2=A0 These patches implement the
> > feedback received on the merged version [1], and the respin [2], for
> > changes related to include/linux/cpumask.h and lib/cpumask.c.
> >=20
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1656777646.git.sander@svanheule.=
net/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1659077534.git.sander@svanheule.=
net/
> >=20
> > Sander Vanheule (3):
> > =C2=A0 cpumask: align signatures of UP implementations
> > =C2=A0 lib/cpumask: add inline cpumask_next_wrap() for UP
> > =C2=A0 lib/cpumask: drop always-true preprocessor guard
>=20
> Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
>=20
> Applying at bitmap-for-next, after some testing.

Thanks! Any chance to get this in for 6.0? I would rather avoid building cp=
umask.o only on 6.0, but
otherwise I don't think anything is functionally wrong with what is current=
ly merged.

Best,
Sander