Received: by 2002:a05:6359:322:b0:b3:69d0:12d8 with SMTP id ef34csp37101rwb; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 04:34:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4ZL8sOGLj6SrBca7l1Xy0BfUaeLuvZU+z93PT56XaQYD7r8K3uWDfUwHxDa2PjHJNly163 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:b590:b0:730:9e03:95a8 with SMTP id qx16-20020a170907b59000b007309e0395a8mr19855213ejc.384.1660131277038; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 04:34:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660131277; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Jpw4RhzWdYaTPcaOZ94Z6K46jpCbK7mTV3h2/SwIF9SE9Zy9wiu/LoGjmgAEZ0Ur4T 2jR6JqS5miicxwLR4Eo0zcDeg+TIQccrIkkmU/BsKpaf+JeNKdF85p/ze0Rk4YnnNLTU vOxbmrkFJ5GxyYC9vybeM11nbU7ryv66at3Zj8ngKKVjQlgEu7jwb/uXKqdJPIjz3MNV ZnAK+dHoAigULORx50ccuY0m15AlQHDSOJz2VJaFpzyPSyf84fP+RYnRuu1movZ6yQ31 9i+ibWW9j5MsR01y/Ww/5T3oDa+Y5mIBZ4Nukh/wx2rPutA8wTU8l/jTs8UEyC7NHPrp GcHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=KhanmYecXEnMTJdMDzqh6u2tstxJgMyyClOfbNdVCJA=; b=rLxJNjLBVX7Eb+p4OHW/tgNSwX3s6XJlfF4D1GfFpwwaZ3NvyLxNEP8++2kcCHHdjI Y9BQB1XJ4C0pHFbqZT/vMUdZk4hwNRYPAYuh76Ux4uB7V+zkKQaZdfPPg47EeHim6+QL H2wgR/TB77+FSxR1GDjUX0IdnDZsKQ8PA3mNAebNfHMZzbn5gCKi4jA0TzE+iYsz7KgW YEX42ONcDrAwAdnea/MYVmXoGhT5/sStNp08OJdqekgDTqrNakPv2nVegNh7q9DeTw/J fmHdRV24bUNjhtZJH1ECWaHzejyRFKxpbyADDgr9QPWC/cQkdsy+chFXc0bQJ1PDrHVT 6S0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=LrypvFqT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v23-20020a17090606d700b0072faefe8609si3687397ejb.107.2022.08.10.04.34.11; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 04:34:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=LrypvFqT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232051AbiHJL1f (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Aug 2022 07:27:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55324 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229816AbiHJL1d (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2022 07:27:33 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B75B661132; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 04:27:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E7661140; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44E7EC433D6; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:27:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1660130850; bh=z/OKIcAzTBcdMX9iK6IKj9KPZAAUaEsnnfpMyrHpeSs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LrypvFqT+Y9bhTA16v1hrCarSogPTCwgAlPsvQvGCLqykm196bOo1XT2fwUZZywWt OMBGxnJ590hLWCvwWWUzknzpVP0GglGacZWqk3gKq05vUq1fKsKxLyKn1MPlxbw2Ih rMg71aIIfGLl3SGUtnFuMTaHH9fz6gGcLhlE9rFpMyGTK06sCVg/cKr8k+/TfSvyRv eG+nznF7TegAwUinc4h+Br2rQ2H5+VjoTnacgyp1A7aWbtaBl58o39xZdQ7wFEqXoi r7J28l4IJ/XOKp/tPZ2iNjqSZF7JWgNe6vbGv2S+ZjfYTUasAcqnySKgrJAfuE9GdG DjljcRwdOBUgQ== Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 12:27:25 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Matt Ranostay Cc: nm@ti.com, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Keerthy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] MFD: TPS6594x: Add new mfd device for TPS6594x PMIC Message-ID: References: <20220805064352.793918-1-mranostay@ti.com> <20220805064352.793918-3-mranostay@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20220805064352.793918-3-mranostay@ti.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 04 Aug 2022, Matt Ranostay wrote: > From: Keerthy > > The TPS6594x chip is a PMIC, and contains the following components: > > - Regulators > - GPIO controller > - RTC > > However initially only RTC is supported. > > Signed-off-by: Keerthy > Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay > --- > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 14 +++++ > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/mfd/tps6594x.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/mfd/tps6594x.h | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 187 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps6594x.c > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/tps6594x.h > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig > index abb58ab1a1a4..cfb5b3d66b76 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig > @@ -1547,6 +1547,20 @@ config MFD_TI_LP873X > This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module > will be called lp873x. > > +config MFD_TPS6594X > + tristate "TI TPS6594X Power Management IC" > + depends on I2C > + select MFD_CORE > + select REGMAP_I2C > + help > + If you say yes here then you get support for the TPS6594X series of > + Power Management Integrated Circuits (PMIC). > + These include voltage regulators, RTS, configurable > + General Purpose Outputs (GPO) that are used in portable devices. > + > + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module > + will be called tps7694x. > + > config MFD_TI_LP87565 > tristate "TI LP87565 Power Management IC" > depends on I2C && OF > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile > index 858cacf659d6..7ff6a8a57d55 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile > @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65910) += tps65910.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912) += tps65912-core.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_I2C) += tps65912-i2c.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_SPI) += tps65912-spi.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS6594X) += tps6594x.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MENELAUS) += menelaus.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE) += twl-core.o twl4030-irq.o twl6030-irq.o > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps6594x.c b/drivers/mfd/tps6594x.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..519162cc1fbe > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps6594x.c > @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > +/* > + * tps6594x.c -- TI TPS6594x chip family multi-function driver No filenames in comments please. Also, there are too many spaces around the '--'. It's not a "multi-function driver" it's a PMIC Core driver. > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/ > + * > + * Author: Keerthy > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include Alphabetical. > +#include > + > +static const struct regmap_config tps6594x_regmap_config = { > + .reg_bits = 8, > + .val_bits = 8, > + .max_register = TPS6594X_REG_MAX, > +}; > + > +static const struct mfd_cell tps6594x_cells[] = { > + { .name = "tps6594x-rtc", }, > +}; Where are the rest of the devices? This is not an MFD with only one device. > +static struct tps6594x *tps; > + > +static void tps6594x_power_off(void) > +{ > + regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS6594X_FSM_NSLEEP_TRIGGERS, 0x3); > + regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS6594X_INT_STARTUP, 0xff); > + regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS6594X_INT_MISC, 0xff); > + regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS6594X_CONFIG_1, 0xc0); > + regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS6594X_FSM_I2C_TRIGGERS, 0x1); No magic numbers please. Define all of those values. > +} > + > +static int tps6594x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > + const struct i2c_device_id *ids) > +{ > + struct tps6594x *tps6594; *ddata is preferred. > + int ret; > + unsigned int otpid; > + struct device_node *node = client->dev.of_node; Re-order these - usually 'structs' go first, then ints. > + tps6594 = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*tps6594), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!tps6594) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + tps6594->dev = &client->dev; > + > + tps6594->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps6594x_regmap_config); > + if (IS_ERR(tps6594->regmap)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(tps6594->regmap); > + dev_err(tps6594->dev, > + "Failed to initialize register map: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + ret = regmap_read(tps6594->regmap, TPS6594X_REG_DEV_REV, &otpid); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(tps6594->dev, "Failed to read OTP ID\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + > + tps6594->rev = otpid; > + > + i2c_set_clientdata(client, tps6594); > + > + ret = mfd_add_devices(tps6594->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, tps6594x_cells, > + ARRAY_SIZE(tps6594x_cells), NULL, 0, NULL); > + > + tps = tps6594; > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,system-power-controller")) > + pm_power_off = tps6594x_power_off; You setting this up even if mfd_add_devices() fails? Seems wrong. > + return ret; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id of_tps6594x_match_table[] = { > + { .compatible = "ti,tps6594x", }, > + {} > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_tps6594x_match_table); > + > +static const struct i2c_device_id tps6594x_id_table[] = { > + { "tps6594x", 0 }, > + { }, > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps6594x_id_table); Remove this and use .probe_new instead please. > +static struct i2c_driver tps6594x_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "tps6594x", > + .of_match_table = of_tps6594x_match_table, > + }, > + .probe = tps6594x_probe, > + .id_table = tps6594x_id_table, > +}; > +module_i2c_driver(tps6594x_driver); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("J Keerthy "); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPS6594X chip family Multi-Function Device driver"); Not an MFD. > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps6594x.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps6594x.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..41349f96f013 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps6594x.h > @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * tps6594x.h -- TI TPS6594x No filenames. > + * Copyright (C) 2016 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/ 2016? > + */ > + > +#ifndef __LINUX_MFD_TPS6594X_H > +#define __LINUX_MFD_TPS6594X_H Any reason go keep the LINUX part? > +#include > + > +/* TPS6594x chip id list */ "ID" > +#define TPS6594X 0x00 > + > +/* All register addresses */ > +#define TPS6594X_REG_DEV_REV 0x01 > +#define TPS6594X_INT_STARTUP 0x65 > +#define TPS6594X_INT_MISC 0x66 > +#define TPS6594X_CONFIG_1 0x7d > +#define TPS6594X_FSM_I2C_TRIGGERS 0x85 > +#define TPS6594X_FSM_NSLEEP_TRIGGERS 0x86 > + > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_SECONDS 0xb5 > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_MINUTES 0xb6 > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_HOURS 0xb7 > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_DAYS 0xb8 > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_MONTHS 0xb9 > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_YEARS 0xba > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_WEEKS 0xbb > +#define TPS6594X_ALARM_SECONDS 0xbc > +#define TPS6594X_ALARM_MINUTES 0xbd > +#define TPS6594X_ALARM_HOURS 0xbe > +#define TPS6594X_ALARM_DAYS 0xbf > +#define TPS6594X_ALARM_MONTHS 0xc0 > +#define TPS6594X_ALARM_YEARS 0xc1 > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_CTRL_1 0xc2 > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_CTRL_2 0xc3 > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_STATUS 0xc4 > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_INTERRUPTS 0xc5 > +#define TPS6594X_REG_MAX 0xd0 > + > +/* Register field definitions */ > +#define TPS6594X_DEV_REV_DEV_ID 0xff > + > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_CTRL_REG_GET_TIME BIT(6) > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_CTRL_REG_STOP_RTC BIT(0) > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG_IT_ALARM BIT(3) > + > +#define TPS6594X_RTC_STATUS_RUN BIT(1) > + > +/** > + * struct tps6594x - state holder for the tps6594x driver > + * @dev: struct device pointer for MFD device > + * @rev: revision of the tps6594x > + * @lock: lock guarding the data structure > + * @regmap: register map of the tps6594x PMIC > + * > + * Device data may be used to access the TPS6594X chip > + */ > +struct tps6594x { > + struct device *dev; > + u8 rev; > + struct regmap *regmap; > +}; Please test compile with W=1 enabled and fix the issues. > +#endif /* __LINUX_MFD_TPS6594X_H */ -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]