Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 07:27:12 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc:     Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>, corbet@lwn.net,
        surenb@google.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        songmuchun@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] sched/psi: per-cgroup PSI stats
 disable/re-enable interface
Message-ID: <YvPqcJh5Ffv4Yga9@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <20220808110341.15799-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
 <20220808110341.15799-10-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
 <YvKd6dezPM6UxfD/@slm.duckdns.org>
 <fcd0bd39-3049-a279-23e6-a6c02b4680a7@bytedance.com>
 <b89155d3-9315-fefc-408b-4cf538360a1c@bytedance.com>
 <YvPN07UlaPFAdlet@cmpxchg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YvPN07UlaPFAdlet@cmpxchg.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:25:07AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> How about just cgroup.pressure? Too ambiguous?
> 
> cgroup.pressure.enable sounds good to me too. Or, because it's
> default-enabled and that likely won't change, cgroup.pressure.disable.

.disable sounds more logical but I like .enable better for some reason. As
for just cgroup.pressure, yeah, maybe? The conundrum is that the prettiness
order is the exact reverse of the logical order. So, I'm okay with any of
the three.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun