Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] Canaan devicetree fixes
In-Reply-To: <338e4fd5-9d6d-6f83-30fb-3ab3ed0ead31@microchip.com>
CC:     airlied@linux.ie, robh+dt@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, daniel@ffwll.ch,
        thierry.reding@gmail.com, sam@ravnborg.org,
        Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com, fancer.lancer@gmail.com,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, masahiroy@kernel.org,
        damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
        niklas.cassel@wdc.com, dillon.minfei@gmail.com,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
To:     Conor.Dooley@microchip.com
Message-ID: <mhng-1373d9c2-ae29-488e-b2c1-032ab2cd52ba@palmer-mbp2014>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 05 Aug 2022 10:51:00 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> On 14/07/2022 23:11, Conor Dooley - M52691 wrote:
>> On 14/07/2022 23:04, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> I'm trying to sort out how to merge this one.  I'm not opposed to taking it through the RISC-V tree as Rob's reviewed/acked the bindings, but just figured I'd say something before putting anything on for-next to try and minimize confusion.
>>>
>>> Unless I'm missing something it's just patch 3 that's been taken so far, via Vinod's tree.  I've dropped that one and put the rest on palmer/riscv-canaan_dt_schema, if that looks good then I'll take it into riscv/for-next when this loops back to the top of my queue.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Patches 1 & 2 never got review from the DRM side and patch 12
>> depends on those. If it comes to it, you could drop those three
>> (and patch 3 that Vinod took). The only other one is patch 4,
>> which has Krzysztof's ack as memory-controller maintainer, so
>> that one should be okay.
> 
> Hey Palmer,
> These fixes have been sitting on palmer/riscv-canaan_dt_schema for
> a few weeks now, without an autobuilder complaint etc. Could you
> move it onto for-next?

These are on for-next.