Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967878AbXFHJP6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 05:15:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932071AbXFHJPs (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 05:15:48 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.233]:6480 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936729AbXFHJPr (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 05:15:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HZkAd0AVH5je9pWWsTNknpGUEZ9sgvMMtubG+TV3fN5HyeBb9CPFY+WQ7QHKCW7Q+gyzn0fafxgUMJ9CczAEctawGc823eMDeaR+I8VvykZV2OWifEvnxYuAfbGHhu178fDA0tmHmJbWKWhaOtOBbR4mZmqVRAzPbU99pCt3nrA= Message-ID: <3877989d0706080215x22f35292g8cb999f8720cd87c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:15:45 +0800 From: "Luming Yu" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 -- x86_64 ACPI panic Cc: "Andy Whitcroft" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Len Brown" , "Yu, Luming" , "Alexey Starikovskiy" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070606105223.c8dece17.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070606020737.4663d686.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4666BDF1.6080801@shadowen.org> <20070606105223.c8dece17.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4142 Lines: 88 The only problem known as to the acpi throttling changes in the mm tree is a typo ,and the patch to fix it is available here. Please test and get results back to me. BTW,the log shows that the acpi-cpufreq.ko has problem. Would please also try not to load acpi-cpufreq. http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0706.0/2509.html On 6/7/07, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:00:17 +0100 Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > > Getting this on a bigger x86_64 (bl6-13): > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000 RIP: > > [] acpi_processor_throttling_seq_show+0xa7/0xd6 > > PGD 2d77067 PUD 34c3067 PMD 0 > > Oops: 0000 [1] SMP > > CPU 3 > > Modules linked in: video output button battery asus_acpi ac lp > > parport_pc parport floppy nvram amd_rng rng_core i2c_amd756 i2c_core > > Pid: 1634, comm: head Not tainted 2.6.22-rc4-mm1-autokern1 #1 > > RIP: 0010:[] [] > > acpi_processor_throttling_seq_show+0xa7/0xd6 > > RSP: 0018:ffff810003c9de48 EFLAGS: 00010246 > > RAX: 0000000000000020 RBX: ffff8100029e7800 RCX: 0000000000000000 > > RDX: 000000000000002a RSI: ffffffff805993e4 RDI: ffff810002d714c0 > > RBP: ffff810002d714c0 R08: ffff810003f82051 R09: ffff810002d714c0 > > R10: ffffffffffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 > > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fff64fd2b90 > > FS: 00002b3545aec6f0(0000) GS:ffff810001683a40(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > > CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000003966000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > Process head (pid: 1634, threadinfo ffff810003c9c000, task ffff810001c8c810) > > Stack: 00000000000000d0 ffff810002d714c0 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 > > 0000000000002000 ffffffff802ab6eb ffff810003c9df50 ffff810002915d00 > > ffff810002d714f0 ffff810002fa2000 0000000000000000 fffffffffffffffb > > Call Trace: > > [] seq_read+0x105/0x28e > > [] seq_read+0x0/0x28e > > [] proc_reg_read+0x80/0x9a > > [] vfs_read+0xcb/0x153 > > [] sys_read+0x45/0x6e > > [] system_call+0x7e/0x83 > > > > > > Code: 45 8b 44 0d 00 44 89 e1 0f 45 d0 31 c0 49 ff c4 49 83 c5 28 > > RIP [] acpi_processor_throttling_seq_show+0xa7/0xd6 > > RSP > > CR2: 0000000000000000 > > FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq > > (/lib/modules/2.6.22-rc4-mm1-autokern1/kernel/arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko): > > No such device > > Was the oops at modprobe time? If so, it seems weird that > acpi_processor_throttling_seq_show() would be getting run at that stage. > > (The oops trace is supposed to show the oopsing process's > task_struct.comm[], but it isn't shown here?) > > Anyway, there are extensive changes in there added by git-acpi.patch. I > suppose we can try to limp along with the below, but it'll probably just > oops later on. > > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c~git-acpi-disable-acpi_processor_throttling_seq_show > +++ a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c > @@ -648,6 +648,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_throttling_seq > goto end; > } > > + seq_puts(seq, "acpi_processor_throttling_seq_show() is busted\n"); > + goto end; > + > seq_printf(seq, "state count: %d\n" > "active state: T%d\n" > "state available: T%d to T%d\n", > _ > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/