Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   min tang <tangmin@cdjrlc.com>
To:     jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc:     hare@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, min tang <tangmin@cdjrlc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: Fix comment typo
Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2022 23:11:46 +0800
Message-Id: <20220811151146.12677-1-tangmin@cdjrlc.com>
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:cdjrlc.com:qybglogicsvr:qybglogicsvr6
Precedence: bulk

The double `the' is duplicated in line 208, remove one.

Signed-off-by: min tang <tangmin@cdjrlc.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
index 39e16eab47aa..28e8b9f1e1a4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static int fcoe_sysfs_fcf_add(struct fcoe_fcf *new)
 		 * that doesn't have a priv (fcf was deleted). However,
 		 * libfcoe will always delete FCFs before trying to add
 		 * them. This is ensured because both recv_adv and
-		 * age_fcfs are protected by the the fcoe_ctlr's mutex.
+		 * age_fcfs are protected by the fcoe_ctlr's mutex.
 		 * This means that we should never get a FCF with a
 		 * non-NULL priv pointer.
 		 */
-- 
2.17.1