Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 03:48:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 03:48:21 -0500 Received: from ns2.arlut.utexas.edu ([129.116.174.1]:41482 "EHLO ns2.arlut.utexas.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 17:05:35 -0500 From: Jonathan Abbey Message-Id: <200112022205.QAA04325@csdsun9.arlut.utexas.edu> Subject: Re: Coding style - a non-issue To: brandon@ovnet.com (Brandon McCombs) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:05:24 -0600 (CST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011202164344.637cef83.brandon@ovnet.com> from "Brandon McCombs" at Dec 2, 2001 04:43:44 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org brandon wrote: | | *finally* someone who doesn't believe in evolution of the human race. | As a side note, i've heard some people say that a bolt of lightning | triggered some proteins to start growing into single celled organisms | and then into what we now call today human beings. I take offense | that I came from a single celled organism. I believe the more complex | an object or system is the less randomness can be added in order to | arrive at the current/final version. I think we all agree the human | body is the most complex object in the universe so how can we say that | our existence was an accident? Again, a complete misunderstanding of evolution. Evolution is itself a design process.. it is simply a design process that admits to an literally unthinkable amount of complexity. No individual or team of individuals, no matter how intelligent, could sit down and create from scratch the Linux kernel as it exists today. There are tons and tons of design elements in the code that emerged from trial and error, and from interactions between the hardware to be supported, the user level code to run on it, and the temporal exigencies of the kernel code itself. The fact that humans applied thought to all (well, at least to some) of the changes made doesn't mean that the overarching dynamic isn't an evolutionary one. Taking offense at evolution having produced us from simpler organisms is like taking offense at the rain, or the sun setting at night. We can now look at life and actually read the code, and see how much is held in common and how much varies between different organisms, just as surely as we can with all of the linux kernels over the last ten years. Both systems have lots of characteristics in common, and for perfect reasons. Linus is right. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathan Abbey jonabbey@arlut.utexas.edu Applied Research Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin Ganymede, a GPL'ed metadirectory for UNIX http://www.arlut.utexas.edu/gash2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/