Received: by 2002:a05:6358:4e97:b0:b3:742d:4702 with SMTP id ce23csp1050467rwb; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:01:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4HfYnbYKKjQQo7tewhOwtFMtm1th9nsbnzLZnz4z+U+HyhJeW6sTS2j8l3YBQ8U6DCr0hy X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d88a:0:b0:440:916e:706d with SMTP id u10-20020aa7d88a000000b00440916e706dmr963816edq.167.1660255268658; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:01:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660255268; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GA+q3o/ijFR+AAG1dk78NY3J4xNJ1Rj48gjsyTeT1un0WBvB0+IiOjuKH365qWCWSQ kHYLcOdHosQLklU0gEXoSqKlqOQEDIkl6C1/4pN6WycFf+ggAQ0daq2RuezXAueSW8oP QdhY+/gwrYVfvCvOEilPdmJe7OfdbLOmPFEsfuux4/j2hyvPLCc87poB+NQhDmqiOIme XCmQRLFjEgsiLvv7z9fVaf4KzYhDNx3XZyDunDoNiPv+i/QS9JMmAP/yKCmDU9z1hgzh EXo1FTjyUJPWbPzgjsiJl+qH4xNEhKJuJtloHx3PayEL4LCAB598EMAJoduJbF4eobyf Octg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=PP9YDeHip3JLgIFd/30i9RiuExqZxhJ75I9LntNprD0=; b=NIztNk10oVh2NZwdyEN0KaXnIH65aj6gNAsTr/crfUTIkCX/secHQG6cyhkBYKl13R wLS7I67SjcfGVuFV7UcIzm9Sn0EVEKYXsOVsCEB5RQ4zLkS4r7CybC6h60UCFAKhhlB0 xRXPmB6f3GuoqeaFV0LcVPT2kZ2j1iZiTrc00UDKKkJuHfx6EZVxd5hTFnXzxDJ5KY5e YFun12goEdJRN7WHlHM+4/ESwLLy/bENWZsSaobDqYOigTgO/EUKqNBuycmg24gXbVKc PSd/yeCN/h0BBbr0kAmwyUFE1x1UEn42RfEvn5ubvnVZ4idhLTuyKFImkuVfZYVLO3N6 x37w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.org.uk header.s=zeniv-20220401 header.b=CciMJdAH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u8-20020a50eac8000000b0043e6a16bca1si493255edp.475.2022.08.11.15.00.43; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.org.uk header.s=zeniv-20220401 header.b=CciMJdAH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235497AbiHKVi0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:38:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45646 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234075AbiHKViZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:38:25 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2a03:a000:7:0:5054:ff:fe1c:15ff]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CBF59F19C; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 14:38:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=PP9YDeHip3JLgIFd/30i9RiuExqZxhJ75I9LntNprD0=; b=CciMJdAHkb4L29AeV9z4VvWNbz fu8e9dbzuSbAiDZhkCRiDNnc74Kk3qDDwqQ83/JFGD/gZzEqES68yUr7KjnYddcEXEyhGGasAC2JO JBGAWQuXO3M58GrcaesbPFBfNDQB187p7wRJ+g5yRN5VZ2A/6OBfXvs3T0s4ft5THjfKFb+DUAWn4 +WxU9a5JbAJX+KEjOZid6rk97Atv5VWbe4j5uY1hqulry8VZqo6JZ9Shyl+SZjbfQINrLrvpiPYNw SlzDsRj9YMIwIM6M9EeC1HAqsXqvT7RzGyy6+WNlHf04ZYWCwUGUq9etKNlq/RoIuN0IUs8NTlcTI CsxgsMVg==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.95 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oMFsj-003Z1H-4O; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 21:38:21 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 22:38:21 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Jeff Layton Cc: Ilya Dryomov , Linus Torvalds , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 5.20-rc1 Message-ID: References: <20220811152446.281723-1-idryomov@gmail.com> <5d0b0367a5e28ec5b1f3b995c7792ff9a5cbcbd4.camel@kernel.org> <72a93a2c8910c3615bba7c093c66c18b1a6a2696.camel@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <72a93a2c8910c3615bba7c093c66c18b1a6a2696.camel@kernel.org> Sender: Al Viro X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 05:30:03PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Thu, 2022-08-11 at 22:22 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 05:08:11PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > > Actually, I never got a formal ack from Al. I did send it repeatedly, > > > but I assume he has been too busy to respond. We've had it sitting in > > > linux-next for a couple of months, and he did suggest that approach in > > > the first place, but I too would also prefer to see his official ack on > > > it. > > > > "Suggested approach" had been about inode_insert5() changes, right? > > Right. I was talking about this patch (which I think is sane): > > fs: change test in inode_insert5 for adding to the sb list It is, AFAICS. > > But that's fs/inode.c side of things... I have to admit that I'd missed > > the unlining d_same_name() - exporting the sucker per se didn't look > > insane and I hadn't looked at that in details ;-/ > > > > Looking at it now... might be worth renaming it into __d_same_name(), > > leaving it inlined and exporting a wrapper; not sure if the impact on > > d_lookup()/__d_lookup()/d_alloc_parallel() is worth worrying about it, > > though. > > > > Profiling a case when we have a plenty of files in the same directory > > on tmpfs, with something earlier in the pathname to kick out of RCU > > mode (e.g. going through /proc/self/cwd) might be interesting... > > The d_name_name changes seemed ok to me, but it would be good to have > your ack (or qualified NAK) if possible. Exporting the functionality? Sure, no problem. Uninlining that one... I suspect that it's OK, but I'd like to see profiling data; it's not as if it would be hard to return to having it inlined, obviously. Again, my apologies for not spotting that one.