Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Da Xue <da@libre.computer>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20220811134445.678446-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com>
References: <20220811134445.678446-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: meson-spicc: add local pow2 clock ops to preserve rate between messages
Message-Id: <166032720712.92213.8055426385524956373.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 19:00:07 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:44:45 +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> At the end of a message, the HW gets a reset in meson_spicc_unprepare_transfer(),
> this resets the SPICC_CONREG register and notably the value set by the
> Common Clock Framework.
> 
> This is problematic because:
> - the register value CCF can be different from the corresponding CCF cached rate
> - CCF is allowed to change the clock rate whenever the HW state
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: meson-spicc: add local pow2 clock ops to preserve rate between messages
      commit: 09992025dacd258c823f50e82db09d7ef06cdac4

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark