Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Tales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@gmail.com>
To:     Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@google.com>, brendanhiggins@google.com,
        corbet@lwn.net
Cc:     Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>, siqueirajordao@riseup.net,
        mwen@igalia.com, andrealmeid@riseup.net, mairacanal@riseup.net,
        Isabella Basso <isabbasso@riseup.net>, magalilemes00@gmail.com,
        tales.aparecida@gmail.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Documentation: KUnit: Fix non-uml anchor
Date:   Sat, 13 Aug 2022 01:20:54 -0300
Message-Id: <20220813042055.136832-4-tales.aparecida@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220813042055.136832-1-tales.aparecida@gmail.com>
References: <20220813042055.136832-1-tales.aparecida@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The section was rewritten but its anchor got left behind.
Fix the anchor and add some references to running on QEMU.

Signed-off-by: Tales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst         | 6 +++---
 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst | 2 ++
 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst       | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
index 172e239791a8..f1b4cef68ced 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ For the most part, the KUnit core framework (what we use to write the tests)
 can compile to any architecture. It compiles like just another part of the
 kernel and runs when the kernel boots, or when built as a module, when the
 module is loaded.  However, there is infrastructure, like the KUnit Wrapper
-(``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``) that does not support other architectures.
+(``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``) that might not support some architectures
+(see :ref:`kunit-on-qemu`).
 
 In short, yes, you can run KUnit on other architectures, but it might require
 more work than using KUnit on UML.
@@ -95,8 +96,7 @@ things to try.
    seeing. When tests are built-in, they will execute when the kernel boots, and
    modules will automatically execute associated tests when loaded. Test results
    can be collected from ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test suite>/results``, and
-   can be parsed with ``kunit.py parse``. For more details, see "KUnit on
-   non-UML architectures" in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst.
+   can be parsed with ``kunit.py parse``. For more details, see :ref:`kunit-on-qemu`.
 
 If none of the above tricks help, you are always welcome to email any issues to
 kunit-dev@googlegroups.com.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
index db1e867820e7..a1070def284f 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
@@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ example: if we only want to run KUnit resource tests, use:
 
 This uses the standard glob format with wildcard characters.
 
+.. _kunit-on-qemu:
+
 Run Tests on qemu
 =================
 
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index 44158eecb51e..2737863ef365 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ built as a module).
 
 For more information, see Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst.
 
+.. _kunit-on-non-uml:
+
 Writing Tests For Other Architectures
 -------------------------------------
 
@@ -544,8 +546,6 @@ By reusing the same ``cases`` array from above, we can write the test as a
 		{}
 	};
 
-.. _kunit-on-non-uml:
-
 Exiting Early on Failed Expectations
 ------------------------------------
 
-- 
2.37.1