Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:11:45 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not
 supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips
Message-ID: <Yve/MSMc/4klJPFL@lunn.ch>
References: <20220729130346.2961889-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
 <20220729130346.2961889-8-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
 <20220802113633.73rxlb2kmihivwpx@skbuf>
 <20220805115601.GB10667@pengutronix.de>
 <20220805134234.ps4qfjiachzm7jv4@skbuf>
 <20220813143215.GA12534@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220813143215.GA12534@pengutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 04:32:15PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 04:42:34PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:56:01PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > Hm, if we will have any random not support OF property in the switch
> > > node. We won't be able to warn about it anyway. So, if it is present
> > > but not supported, we will just ignore it.
> > > 
> > > I'll drop this patch.
> > 
> > To continue, I think the right way to go about this is to edit the
> > dt-schema to say that these properties are only applicable to certain
> > compatible strings, rather than for all. Then due to the
> > "unevaluatedProperties: false", you'd get the warnings you want, at
> > validation time.
> 
> Hm, with "unevaluatedProperties: false" i have no warnings. Even if I
> create examples with random strings as properties. Are there some new
> json libraries i should use?

Try

additionalProperties: False

	Andrew