Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 13 Aug 2022 16:27:15 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To:     Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@sberdevices.ru>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "stano.jakubek@gmail.com" <stano.jakubek@gmail.com>,
        "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        "lars@metafoo.de" <lars@metafoo.de>,
        "stephan@gerhold.net" <stephan@gerhold.net>,
        "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@sberdevices.ru>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iio: add MEMSensing MSA311 3-axis accelerometer
 driver
Message-ID: <20220813162715.2c8bdc47@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <20220809103519.437rcude7fstxyy4@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
References: <20220803131132.19630-1-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru>
        <20220803131132.19630-3-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru>
        <CAHp75VcVuC6yVoB1kycCOfqMa=JfCtbe3WYSK5qndtYcJy3vpg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20220803191621.tzrmndkygfe7nlpx@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
        <20220806155523.37c3e587@jic23-huawei>
        <20220809095251.vpp6arac3pkntdlo@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
        <CAHp75Vc9LGX-=Y2smOrKuAgSRrhA0AgGuBE-0=_-q78FpSB6ag@mail.gmail.com>
        <20220809103519.437rcude7fstxyy4@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 10:35:19 +0000
Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@sberdevices.ru> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 12:05:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > +       indio_dev->modes = 0; /* setup buffered mode later */  
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why explicit assignment to 0? Doesn't kzalloc() do it for you?  
> > > > >
> > > > > kzalloc() will do it for me, of course. Previously, I initialized modes to
> > > > > INDIO_DIRECT_MODE to just provide default value for that. Jonathan
> > > > > suggested to replace it with 0.  
> > > >
> > > > I did?  I wonder what I was smoking that day.
> > > > Should be set to INDIO_DIRECT_MODE as you had it previously.
> > > >
> > > > (From what I recall it will work either way but we have in the past had
> > > > core code that checked this and may do again in the future so drivers should
> > > > still be setting it to specify they provide sysfs interfaces to directly read
> > > > the channels).  
> > >
> > > Jonathan, really sorry I referred to you. I'm confused. This comment was
> > > from Andy in the v3 discussion:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CAHp75Vc0+ckNnm2tzLMPrjeFRjwoj3zy0C4koNShFRG3kP8b6w@mail.gmail.com/  
> > 
> > Indeed. I was confused by the comment. My understanding at that time
> > was that the triggered mode is inevitable and hence assigning to
> > something which _will_ be reassigned later makes a little sense. So,
> > does it mean that triggered mode is optional and might not be set? In
> > such a case the comment is misleading.  
> 
> Actually, this comment was introduced in the early MSA311 driver
> versions, when I have made buffer setup only if HW irq is enabled. In
> the newest versions buffer is setup unconditionally, because buffer mode
> can be used based on hrtimer software trigger.
> 
> Jonathan, why we shouldn't delete INDIO_DIRECT_MODE initialization if
> after couple of lines we always setup buffer mode?
> 

The buffered mode setup does
modes |= INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED;
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-triggered-buffer.c#L71

Direct mode indicates that it is possible to read the channels without
using any of the triggered modes (there are devices - though rare - where
it is not set as they are only accessible through FIFOs for example).

We don't make much use of IIO_DIRECT_MODE today (though we did until fairly
recently).  It could be replaced with a specific check on provision of
raw / processed channels I guess - but I'm not that keen to see it go without
thinking hard about whether we should be using that flag to catch misconfiguration
in some cases.  So I'd rather postpone any changes in that for now.

Jonathan