Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220726102024.1.Icc838fe7bf0ef54a014ab2fee8af311654f5342a@changeid>
References: <20220726102024.1.Icc838fe7bf0ef54a014ab2fee8af311654f5342a@changeid>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()
Message-Id: <166057828188.697572.9391830884435789646.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 16:44:41 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:20:29 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Since we don't actually pass the load to the firmware, switch to using
> get_optimum_mode() instead of open-coding it.
> 
> This is intended to have no effect other than cleanup.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()
      commit: efb0cb50c42734f868908a97f0d93e9208da1f0e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark