Received: by 2002:a05:6358:4e97:b0:b3:742d:4702 with SMTP id ce23csp2882556rwb; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:14:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR79nER2O0UYDn23WN9iiQB4IYJv934zVB/k2kGFsc8DH31xzu7ZC3qfv9Pqpxh+5lWGt/Lk X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2cc9:b0:730:93c8:4177 with SMTP id hg9-20020a1709072cc900b0073093c84177mr10709083ejc.494.1660594481009; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:14:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660594481; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vUafAMM/U3zQzhJrfv6QCJm6shnuoDFLZR389cdbISOfiFWcCF38Jp3E4hveX1xTpt bQ48PVeFORW1Dk1AmOS6vi/Yyfc/UtybZ84GMIiw/YedMwWEUjpiareWl9SZH5PJS2bl LwdRDYIcdHJktualUnt2IXE0Q7R1+NWbW7n8LT4FqFkUwzzLfqiUoMnQifmMzb/TLOfq 5U5Gn4B4Qk966nZCCGc//jAnYC3RBUiXn5WH0VlIif7dAg2HSTJvGCc4Oy2+X6WIU9aP 8NdwxaGbUuy1LRFkPkVArZ2Zkg05fKBxkNd44k3XyVLfTNl23ZBlxXXh+qwOjWe9ij07 gh3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=VWwYSjUeNhVihkG8IZbdXNLMtEY8AJdMxVL4z9IU55g=; b=ck5Zz5O+BwlcWDVEvzhEOmCgBqit2VocTbAjgAE5i/ZUe7rAsx9pvfU7Pb9fi9ufJj l3T9IYyODQAg+4Cw1Op8xYZ8QLwrCgd5lILLX0qaNHrzkc+W2QWoC0HnC+GQtf2Gy9S+ 68o1ScVu9ZtQzOaTuvC9qJuZraPf8RijLPKXVOSED5KGRtjofkNFD2c8kFb6O6SZJogI tfjdqKpkmUqyHbIOZTJM3wGTr9dUJ3bTHM6i2RWjnnshuBbxHI3rGI+qMapwTktyFt2W USSGoViWqkw840IQ0vAqvKhKE6hFXRgLHSceYOkRN2Bt1PizDae6odEKjJ33DVY2lCDY I7gg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=Dp+nX2s8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gt34-20020a1709072da200b00730d37d3f0asi8936599ejc.766.2022.08.15.13.14.14; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=Dp+nX2s8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240191AbiHOSTM (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:19:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58070 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239596AbiHOSST (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:18:19 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63622B600; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F6AFB80F99; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABB4CC433D6; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1660587348; bh=JmnDMjwkWsvNqz6dp+MmN/LDD/MPsnsmOvEuvPBt5DU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Dp+nX2s841eveU3CnSzPsvTvVX9aMsp7jhaCd8H8DvuviS7NIob6QCt7u9UI3T/0Q XTIHfvuwLR5sSYdhceEKaOiAXXRrUHlOlIJHXWzAT2/vl3fWF33waTceFaBmijWGNj XXbNGCTPNzBSIn97j8+2gOLFevy3f8/+DS39+KBg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Subject: [PATCH 5.15 024/779] KVM: x86: Split kvm_is_valid_cr4() and export only the non-vendor bits Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:54:28 +0200 Message-Id: <20220815180338.250121372@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.2 In-Reply-To: <20220815180337.130757997@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220815180337.130757997@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sean Christopherson commit c33f6f2228fe8517e38941a508e9f905f99ecba9 upstream. Split the common x86 parts of kvm_is_valid_cr4(), i.e. the reserved bits checks, into a separate helper, __kvm_is_valid_cr4(), and export only the inner helper to vendor code in order to prevent nested VMX from calling back into vmx_is_valid_cr4() via kvm_is_valid_cr4(). On SVM, this is a nop as SVM doesn't place any additional restrictions on CR4. On VMX, this is also currently a nop, but only because nested VMX is missing checks on reserved CR4 bits for nested VM-Enter. That bug will be fixed in a future patch, and could simply use kvm_is_valid_cr4() as-is, but nVMX has _another_ bug where VMXON emulation doesn't enforce VMX's restrictions on CR0/CR4. The cleanest and most intuitive way to fix the VMXON bug is to use nested_host_cr{0,4}_valid(). If the CR4 variant routes through kvm_is_valid_cr4(), using nested_host_cr4_valid() won't do the right thing for the VMXON case as vmx_is_valid_cr4() enforces VMX's restrictions if and only if the vCPU is post-VMXON. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Message-Id: <20220607213604.3346000-2-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 3 ++- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 ++-- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 +++++++++--- arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 2 +- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c @@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ static bool nested_vmcb_check_cr3_cr4(st return false; } - if (CC(!kvm_is_valid_cr4(vcpu, save->cr4))) + /* Note, SVM doesn't have any additional restrictions on CR4. */ + if (CC(!__kvm_is_valid_cr4(vcpu, save->cr4))) return false; return true; --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -3213,8 +3213,8 @@ static bool vmx_is_valid_cr4(struct kvm_ { /* * We operate under the default treatment of SMM, so VMX cannot be - * enabled under SMM. Note, whether or not VMXE is allowed at all is - * handled by kvm_is_valid_cr4(). + * enabled under SMM. Note, whether or not VMXE is allowed at all, + * i.e. is a reserved bit, is handled by common x86 code. */ if ((cr4 & X86_CR4_VMXE) && is_smm(vcpu)) return false; --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ int kvm_emulate_xsetbv(struct kvm_vcpu * } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_emulate_xsetbv); -bool kvm_is_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4) +bool __kvm_is_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4) { if (cr4 & cr4_reserved_bits) return false; @@ -1039,9 +1039,15 @@ bool kvm_is_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *v if (cr4 & vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits) return false; - return static_call(kvm_x86_is_valid_cr4)(vcpu, cr4); + return true; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_is_valid_cr4); + +static bool kvm_is_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4) +{ + return __kvm_is_valid_cr4(vcpu, cr4) && + static_call(kvm_x86_is_valid_cr4)(vcpu, cr4); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_is_valid_cr4); void kvm_post_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long old_cr4, unsigned long cr4) { --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static inline void kvm_machine_check(voi void kvm_load_guest_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void kvm_load_host_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); int kvm_spec_ctrl_test_value(u64 value); -bool kvm_is_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4); +bool __kvm_is_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4); int kvm_handle_memory_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int r, struct x86_exception *e); int kvm_handle_invpcid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long type, gva_t gva);