Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754757AbXFIPSO (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 11:18:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752612AbXFIPSE (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 11:18:04 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57955 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751155AbXFIPSA (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 11:18:00 -0400 From: Andreas Gruenbacher Organization: SuSE Labs, Novell To: Sean Subject: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 17:17:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: david@lang.hm, Greg KH , Stephen Smalley , Pavel Machek , jjohansen@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070514110607.549397248@suse.de> <20070609041045.f3b7a7ec.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <20070609041045.f3b7a7ec.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706091717.57923.agruen@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 642 Lines: 16 On Saturday 09 June 2007 10:10, Sean wrote: > Clinging to the current AA implementation instead of honestly considering > reasonable alternatives does not inspire confidence or teamwork. What you imply is pretty insulting. I can assure you we looked into many possible implementation choices, and we considered a fair number of alternatives. Have you seen the ``AppArmor FAQ'' thread? Andreas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/