Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761320AbXFIUzp (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 16:55:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754613AbXFIUzj (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 16:55:39 -0400 Received: from adsl-70-250-156-241.dsl.austtx.swbell.net ([70.250.156.241]:34463 "EHLO gw.microgate.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751834AbXFIUzi (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 16:55:38 -0400 Message-ID: <466B2111.8020301@microgate.com> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:52:17 -0600 From: Paul Fulghum User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Steinbrink?= , Paul Fulghum , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Alan Cox , Nicolas Mailhot , Randy Dunlap , "bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty restore locked ioctl file op References: <1179098742.7322.5.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org> <1179396003.31796.4.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org> <20070517094557.c96f7e54.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <1179421196.5000.5.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org> <1180206615.3430.8.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org> <20070608030629.GA18493@atjola.homenet> <1181315809.4811.5.camel@x2.microgate.com> <1181330448.5365.7.camel@amdx2.microgate.com> <20070608123350.5cc53c10.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1181334857.3408.0.camel@x2.microgate.com> <20070609181805.GA2771@atjola.homenet> In-Reply-To: <20070609181805.GA2771@atjola.homenet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 943 Lines: 26 Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote: > Sorry for the delay, your mails didn't make it into my inbox, and I > usually just mark threads on which I'm Cc'ed as read in my lkml mailbox, > thus I didn't notice it earlier. Any traces of the lost mails on your > side? No clues on this end. > The patch works as expected, no Oops in sight. Regarding the > reproducability, it might be that it was easier to trigger on rc1. When > I retried today with rc4, I only got 2 Oopses in a minute, while the > first test had spitten out about 20 Oopses in 10 seconds (not sure if I > really had rc1 running back then, though). I'm sure it's very timing dependent. I'm confident with this fix. Thanks for your help. -- Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/