Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753372AbXFJInh (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:43:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751188AbXFJIna (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:43:30 -0400 Received: from smtpgw02.netonehosting.com ([193.192.98.26]:43042 "EHLO smtpgw02.netonehosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000AbXFJIn3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:43:29 -0400 Message-ID: <466BB9B0.5030908@netone.net.tr> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:43:28 +0300 From: Tarkan Erimer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 References: <466A3EC6.6030706@netone.net.tr> <18026.16739.228277.938421@notabene.brown> <20070609071231.GL2649@lug-owl.de> In-Reply-To: <20070609071231.GL2649@lug-owl.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NETONE-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NETONE-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-NETONE-MailScanner-From: tarkan@netone.net.tr Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1811 Lines: 40 Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Sat, 2007-06-09 15:57:55 +1000, Neil Brown wrote: > >> On Saturday June 9, tarkan@netone.net.tr wrote: >> >>> As we know the forthcoming GPL V3 will be not compatible with the GPL V2 >>> and Linux Kernel is GPL V2 only. >>> So, another point is, which is previously mentioned by Linus and others, >>> that if it is decided to upgrade the Linux Kernel's License to GPL V3, >>> it is needed the permission of all the maintainers permission who >>> contributed to the Linux Kernel and there are a lot of lost or dead >>> maintainers. Which makes it impossible to get all the maintainers' >>> permission. >>> >> You don't need the permission of maintainers. You need the permission >> of copyright owners. The two groups overlap, but are not the same. >> Dead people cannot own anything, even copyright. Their estate >> probably can. I don't think it is theoretically impossible to get >> everyone's permission, though it may be quite close to practically >> impossible. >> > > And the next question is: How much copyright does a copyright owner > own? For example, think of drivers written by one person, but a small > number of lines changed here and there by others to adopt the code to > new APIs. Ask them all, I think? > > MfG, JBG > > And maybe another questions should be : How long a copyright owner can hold the copyright, if died or lost for sometime ? if died, the copyright still should be valid or not ? If lost, what the law orders at this point for copyright holding ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/