Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752520AbXFJItZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:49:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751024AbXFJItS (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:49:18 -0400 Received: from smtpgw02.netonehosting.com ([193.192.98.26]:44404 "EHLO smtpgw02.netonehosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750816AbXFJItR (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:49:17 -0400 Message-ID: <466BBB0B.4050303@netone.net.tr> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:49:15 +0300 From: Tarkan Erimer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Brown CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 References: <466A3EC6.6030706@netone.net.tr> <18026.16739.228277.938421@notabene.brown> In-Reply-To: <18026.16739.228277.938421@notabene.brown> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NETONE-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NETONE-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-NETONE-MailScanner-From: tarkan@netone.net.tr Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1281 Lines: 33 Hi Neil, Neil Brown wrote: > On Saturday June 9, tarkan@netone.net.tr wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As we know the forthcoming GPL V3 will be not compatible with the GPL V2 >> and Linux Kernel is GPL V2 only. >> So, another point is, which is previously mentioned by Linus and others, >> that if it is decided to upgrade the Linux Kernel's License to GPL V3, >> it is needed the permission of all the maintainers permission who >> contributed to the Linux Kernel and there are a lot of lost or dead >> maintainers. Which makes it impossible to get all the maintainers' >> permission. >> > > You don't need the permission of maintainers. You need the permission > of copyright owners. The two groups overlap, but are not the same. > Dead people cannot own anything, even copyright. Their estate > probably can. I don't think it is theoretically impossible to get > everyone's permission, though it may be quite close to practically > impossible. > > So, does it mean we can change the license of the dead people's code ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/