Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 0495/1157] kunit: executor: Fix a memory leak on failure in kunit_filter_tests
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:57:31 +0200
Message-Id: <20220815180459.456122374@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220815180439.416659447@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20220815180439.416659447@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.67
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 94681e289bf5d10c9db9db143d1a22d8717205c5 ]

It's possible that memory allocation for 'filtered' will fail, but for the
copy of the suite to succeed. In this case, the copy could be leaked.

Properly free 'copy' in the error case for the allocation of 'filtered'
failing.

Note that there may also have been a similar issue in
kunit_filter_subsuites, before it was removed in "kunit: flatten
kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites".

This was reported by clang-analyzer via the kernel test robot, here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8073b8e-7b9e-0830-4177-87c12f16349c@intel.com/

And by smatch via Dan Carpenter and the kernel test robot:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202207101328.ASjx88yj-lkp@intel.com/

Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 lib/kunit/executor.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
index 96f96e42ce06..16fb88c0aca3 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
@@ -76,8 +76,10 @@ kunit_filter_tests(struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob)
 	memcpy(copy, suite, sizeof(*copy));
 
 	filtered = kcalloc(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!filtered)
+	if (!filtered) {
+		kfree(copy);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
 
 	n = 0;
 	kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
-- 
2.35.1