Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:12:43 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Conor.Dooley@microchip.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc:     palmer@dabbelt.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, atishp@atishpatra.org,
        Brice.Goglin@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting
Message-ID: <20220816091243.apz7p2rb4wbxdh2t@bogus>
References: <4849490e-b362-c13a-c2e4-82acc3268a3f@microchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4849490e-b362-c13a-c2e4-82acc3268a3f@microchip.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:14:55PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> Hey Will/Palmer/Sudeep,
> 
> Catalin suggested [0] dropping the CC: stable for the arm64 patch and
> instead making it a specific prereq of the RISC-V patch & making a PR,
> so here we are.. I was still up when -rc1 came out so pushed it last
> night to get the test coverage, but LKP seems to not have reported a
> build success since early on the 13th so not holding my horses! I built
> it again for both ARMs and RISC-V myself.
> 
> I tagged it tonight, so it's on conor/linux.git as riscv-topo-on-6.0-rc1
> with the prereq specified.
> 
> Not sure if you want to merge this too Sudeep or if that's up to Greg?

I don't have any other patch(other than a fix that I requested Greg to
pick it up directly yesterday) and since you have tagged it already, may be
Greg can pull this or patches directly based on his preference.

--
Regards,
Sudeep