Received: by 2002:a05:6358:4e97:b0:b3:742d:4702 with SMTP id ce23csp3515802rwb; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:36:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6uvjgoyGqk8UHsLH5SucNovbChf41QZjQNoT+J1bXFfELz79MI+rxg/G7ze3eZ5zUVSiZd X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6297:b0:72f:9aad:fcb with SMTP id nd23-20020a170907629700b0072f9aad0fcbmr12798808ejc.161.1660649780789; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:36:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660649780; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DsEn6/wT3GOwTxkW9Twq2Z6SfL3GYWdJF+0WnBxMxVHCCDy87M3m4bg96qxaGznJoh fTyQUjfzG4N9PGYRByVgQOhXdRncGDi0ZIiPex5+GGOYyWM51HWiC38F1Fkz5QDQ6Es6 3LbQ3JA2UXjSxuVJ4jK64kQMW2R500gmRWLKJKDmhnElty3XDmi/S+jqY4ppiNHUnd7s XXHhWYDbd6sIcghn/5ebn1ORanhaMBbdwrkcNQSzpO/JbYGokazHn8c4zCWSzNRbjojH PYZPPbjlxhlgRrmTXKR/Ssr7yt1/JBWxNy5H2S+cLBDM1u+KM1cneIblcVA+s7vSAMoE 4IqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=h9wjAwwQyjRfd07SX7BxwEs8PB91Sy/sB8Ge4JY9xjA=; b=WloI3Pfd83TNhmO89e1aMIoKwzSzB6IkrPteJtNsgWQPSQJQUAeHn0WMVS9gx+NR0s GNDntyB25XPihXkzUUbWfhTUF2dsMuRjVtMRqZE3m/110mDho794IEfoOZt/Ky/DmEWH 62JV64cSJfsw0K/JehhQUNvg1BwWdG/4o9v5NX3Kt66hJoqDuyiSsjPP9YA4BDAIJ4L2 jRn/G2gr5azZzeK0TXsBRhoFuDGFipqrCjAVJyDegYHX9IoHKD6BkYa8yP640HqQpJfq CNm2foA6MN+97wIUOeZ2FdoboMt/gA9kf7hEyzrqCuaWoUbtkCPCG8/eYi8eSLgPX54c j4mA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=c4wQZ93W; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y13-20020a50bb0d000000b0043e1ac44b4dsi9824772ede.309.2022.08.16.04.35.53; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=c4wQZ93W; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234644AbiHPLec (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:34:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40350 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234148AbiHPLd4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:33:56 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECC532DBD; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 03:55:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1660647348; x=1692183348; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Z9fMHT2HnWmkrrf6jkOtAdYck/68fWD7Cuc65/D83ew=; b=c4wQZ93WzwWOfm40IRBtnZiNgIkIMvGBR+Y9B5176/AEZj6FBGdAJZrm QgGE6NeR+9E/H/bVZVsYdZ+k9fNaor6Feu7JH73H+iDFi/qUPvKz6oq0h aqu9N0cw1t0eSnX1BGOBV1vwUErvSvc6TvkYObAO/oUpJ4098NcJe4QEg QAkXICJjoVcc1p7mJRdKSG133TtHRAylq3jATCAWsOZ5Uq21iblDnWeSW JzTCGngnhRoCImW7octHSO76LGGuCpBX5tuG/JCS3GJT9oytH8EkX5m2N uG/WlwxKvEncSkplWERZPIDs01jc1RNuchUE5FdpSVFiGDuguC/+VmWX6 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10440"; a="290939780" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,240,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="290939780" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2022 03:55:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,240,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="733250064" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2022 03:55:42 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A35AA2F6; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:55:55 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:55:55 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, koba.ko@canonical.com, "David E . Box" , Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Disable upstream port PTM during suspend Message-ID: References: <20220706123244.18056-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220706123244.18056-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:32:44PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > On Intel Alder Lake platforms, Thunderbolt entering D3cold can cause > some errors reported by AER: > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: 0000:00:1d.0 > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Requester ID) > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: device [8086:7ab0] error status/mask=00100000/00004000 > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: [20] UnsupReq (First) > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: TLP Header: 34000000 08000052 00000000 00000000 > thunderbolt 0000:0a:00.0: AER: can't recover (no error_detected callback) > xhci_hcd 0000:3e:00.0: AER: can't recover (no error_detected callback) > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: device recovery failed > > In addition to that, it can also block system from suspending when > a Thunderbolt dock is attached to the same system. > > The original approach [1] is to disable AER and DPC when link is in > L2/L3 Ready, L2 and L3, but Bjorn identified the root cause is the Unsupported > Request: > - 08:00.0 sent a PTM Request Message (a Posted Request) > - 00:1d.0 received the PTM Request Message > - The link transitioned to DL_Down > - Per sec 2.9.1, 00:1d.0 discarded the Request and reported an > Unsupported Request > - Or, per sec 6.21.3, if 00:1d.0 received a PTM Request when its > own PTM Enable was clear, it would also be treated as an > Unsupported Request > > And further: 'David did something like this [1], but just for Root Ports. That > looks wrong to me because sec 6.21.3 says we should not have PTM enabled in an > Upstream Port (i.e., in a downstream device like 08:00.0) unless it is already > enabled in the Downstream Port (i.e., in the Root Port 00:1d.0).' > > So also disable upstream port PTM to make the PCI driver conform to the spec > and solve the issue. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220408153159.106741-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220422222433.GA1464120@bhelgaas/ > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215453 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216210 > Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas > Cc: David E. Box > Cc: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg