Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] struct list_node
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706101013420.20321@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706101317090.14121@woody.linux-foundation.org>
References: <1181452290.16428.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
 <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706101013420.20321@woody.linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1126
Lines: 28


On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> The Linux kernel list.h is _better_ than most stupid list implementations 
> that think that a head node is different from the list node. Exactly 
> because it very naturally supports the notion of "this structure exists in 
> a 'ring of entries'" where each node is 100% equivalent to any other node, 
> and there _is_ no head.

Btw, to extend a bit on this: there actually *is* a "list with a head" 
implementation in <linux/list.h>, called "hlist".

Now, the "h" actually historically stands for "hash", but if you prefer, 
you can think of it as standing for "head", and be happy.

And if you want a head, you really do want to use "hlist", since the head 
is smaller than a list entry (a single pointer rather than two).

And yes, I'm sure we could change some "struct list" users to "struct 
hlist" if you wanted to.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/