Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S284637AbRLDAVC>; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 19:21:02 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S284757AbRLDAQC>; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 19:16:02 -0500
Received: from pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.19.3]:32785 "EHLO
	pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S284495AbRLCMI1>; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 07:08:27 -0500
Message-Id: <200112031208.fB3C8CsE032561@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue] 
In-Reply-To: Message from Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> 
   of "Sun, 02 Dec 2001 15:54:40 -0800." <20011202155440.F2622@work.bitmover.com> 
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 09:08:12 -0300
From: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> said:
> skraw@ithnet.com on Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 11:52:32PM +0100 said:

[...]

> > You will not find _any_ match with 128 CPUs here.                     
> 
> Nor will you find any match with 4 or 8 CPU systems, except in very rare
> cases.  Yet changes go into the system for 8 way and 16 way performance.
> That's a mistake.

And you are proposing a fork for handling exactly this? I don't get it...
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/