Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220816185801.651091-1-shy828301@gmail.com> <CALvZod5t7Qo1NQ040pRyWco+nJGn3hSrxZyuFQ0UBi31Ni6=_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALvZod5t7Qo1NQ040pRyWco+nJGn3hSrxZyuFQ0UBi31Ni6=_g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Aug 2022 19:01:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkrSU3ZHRiZAxy9Jju3-3ZFpDmE4uMx81c+yPWN28_j+tw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: export workingset refault stats for cgroup v1
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 3:06 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:58 AM Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Workingset refault stats are important and usefule metrics to measure
> > how well reclaimer and swapping work and how healthy the services are,
> > but they are just available for cgroup v2.  There are still plenty users
> > with cgroup v1, export the stats for cgroup v1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > I do understand the development of cgroup v1 is actually stalled and
> > the community is reluctant to accept new features for v1.  However
> > the workingset refault stats are really quite useful and exporting
> > two new stats, which have been supported by v2, seems ok IMHO.  So
> > hopefully this patch could be considered.  Thanks.
> >
>
> Is just workingset refault good enough for your use-case? What about
> the other workingset stats? I don't have a strong opinion against
> adding these to v1 and I think these specific stats should be fine.

The workingset refault is good enough for our usercase, but I don't
mind adding all the workingset_* stats if nobody has objection.

> (There is subtlety in exposing objcg based stats (i.e. reparenting) in
> v1 due to non-hierarchical stats in v1. I remember Yosry and Muchun
> were looking into that.)

The workingset_* stats should have nothing to do with obj based stats IIUC.