Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <9c331cdc-e34a-1146-fb83-84c2107b2e2a@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:50:26 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update
 bindings for J7200 CPSW5G
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
        vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
        nsekhar@ti.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kishon@ti.com
References: <20220816060139.111934-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com>
 <20220816060139.111934-2-s-vadapalli@ti.com>
 <79e58157-f8f2-6ca8-1aa6-b5cf6c83d9e6@linaro.org>
 <31c3a5b0-17cc-ad7b-6561-5834cac62d3e@ti.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <31c3a5b0-17cc-ad7b-6561-5834cac62d3e@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 17/08/2022 08:14, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:

>>> -      port@[1-2]:
>>> +      "^port@[1-4]$":
>>>          type: object
>>>          description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>>>  
>>> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>>>          properties:
>>>            reg:
>>>              minimum: 1
>>> -            maximum: 2
>>> +            maximum: 4
>>>              description: CPSW port number
>>>  
>>>            phys:
>>> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>>>  
>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>  
>>> +if:
>>
>> This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false
> 
> allOf was added by me in v3 series patch and it is not present in the
> file. I removed it in v4 after Rob Herring's suggestion. Please let me
> know if simply moving the if-then statements to the line above
> additionalProperties:false would be fine.

I think Rob's comment was focusing not on using or not-using allOf, but
on format of your entire if-then-else. Your v3 was huge and included
allOf in wrong place).

Now you add if-then in proper place, but it is still advisable to put it
with allOf, so if ever you grow the if-then by new entry, you do not
have to change the indentation.

Anyway the location is not correct. Regardless if this is if-then or
allOf-if-then, put it just like example schema is suggesting.

Best regards,
Krzysztof