Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756670AbXFKGJU (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:09:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750732AbXFKGJK (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:09:10 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44896 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750728AbXFKGJJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:09:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:02:59 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Jesper Juhl , Tsugikazu Shibata , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com Subject: Re: kconfig .po files in kernel tree? [Was: Documentation/HOWTO translated into Japanese] Message-ID: <20070611060259.GA914@suse.de> References: <20070610.204845.115909592.tshibata@ab.jp.nec.com> <9a8748490706100524o2dff1954ja7406f9303d8499f@mail.gmail.com> <20070610162221.GA12830@suse.de> <20070610175228.GA28947@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070610175228.GA28947@uranus.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1722 Lines: 38 On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I > > > personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the > > > tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the > > > authoritative docs stay in the tree, in english, so that as many > > > contributors as possible can read and update them. It would then be a > > > seperate project to generate translations and keep them updated > > > according to what's in the tree. Perhaps we could get the kernel.org > > > people to create an official space for that and then place a pointer > > > to that site in Documentation/ somewhere. > > > > No, I think the translated files should be in the tree proper, we have > > the space :) > > We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then > the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree. > > I advocated that they should stay out back then. > But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles > having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc araound. > > Any opinion about the .po files? I have no objection for them to be around in the tree, it might help out some users who want to build their own kernels, and allow the -stable kernels to catch up on the translations. So I would encourage their addition, if possible. thanks, greg 'not everyone speaks english' k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/