Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763514AbXFKHvJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:51:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752184AbXFKHu4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:50:56 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:49121 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751274AbXFKHu4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:50:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:50:24 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tarkan Erimer Cc: Al Viro , Greg KH , debian developer , "david@lang.hm" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Message-ID: <20070611075024.GD32446@elte.hu> References: <466BB9B0.5030908@netone.net.tr> <466BCBBC.90305@netone.net.tr> <466C0901.4000405@netone.net.tr> <20070610161306.GA12310@kroah.com> <466CEFBA.7090807@netone.net.tr> <20070611070842.GH21478@ftp.linux.org.uk> <466CF812.5020105@netone.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466CF812.5020105@netone.net.tr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1440 Lines: 33 * Tarkan Erimer wrote: > > > >> I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License" > > > >> the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL > > > >> compatible.). > > > > > > > > The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not > > > > want to accept GPLv3, why not discuss this with them if you want > > > > to try to change their minds? > > > > > > It was just an example came to my mind at first when thinking > > > about "Dual Licensing" or upgrading Linux Kernel to the GPLv3. > > > Yeah maybe,the "OpenSolaris Community" do not want GPLv3. But; > > > IMHO, it is in the hands of "Sun" not the "OpenSolaris Community". > > > > Perhaps. However, since the only thing in hands of your kind of > > advocates is best not mentioned on a family-friendly maillist, may I > > suggest taking that exciting thread to more appropriate place? > > I don't think that this thread is going unfriendly or harmfully. > However, what is your suggestion ? if you want to change the minds of the OpenSolaris community, i'd proffer that it's perhaps more efficient to talk to them, not to the linux-kernel mailing list. Thanks, Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/