Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757614AbXFKIS5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:18:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753396AbXFKISs (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:18:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:60235 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753182AbXFKISr (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:18:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:18:29 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tarkan Erimer Cc: Al Viro , Greg KH , debian developer , "david@lang.hm" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Message-ID: <20070611081829.GB9852@elte.hu> References: <466BCBBC.90305@netone.net.tr> <466C0901.4000405@netone.net.tr> <20070610161306.GA12310@kroah.com> <466CEFBA.7090807@netone.net.tr> <20070611070842.GH21478@ftp.linux.org.uk> <466CF812.5020105@netone.net.tr> <20070611075024.GD32446@elte.hu> <466D0054.5060807@netone.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466D0054.5060807@netone.net.tr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1041 Lines: 29 * Tarkan Erimer wrote: > [...] Just, I asked simple question and included a simple example in > it. [...] actually, what you said was this: " I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License" the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL compatible.). " and to that the answer was: " The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not want to accept GPLv3 [...] " in other words: your hypothetical is false today. You called us to do a specific action, but why did you then include a factually false 'example' to underline that point of yours? Or if you simply did not know about the OpenSolaris community's position beforehand, why dont you just admit that and withdraw from that line of argument gracefully? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/