Received: by 2002:a05:6358:4e97:b0:b3:742d:4702 with SMTP id ce23csp4773682rwb; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:03:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR51wq5HICf67vn9gTiNmhQY7/3xHVnW2IQu96am9rHr62J+DUMZmXQZLOrEREobaioO2m6k X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6095:b0:731:87a0:b9e8 with SMTP id ht21-20020a170907609500b0073187a0b9e8mr16959239ejc.124.1660741382007; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:03:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660741381; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q9Sx5hx6tQJCJA6gg6lhSwWROj8mqIOtYj/28Qn1HUvdhgP2YZY/yKOeJ8YLhXrDBt GUqJmphEQDpbZTCnf5oJ0tLYE+RRN0ZcnbomlEBUyNJulcJyUjKl/u1sk3N6ta12Idi5 hBXOlSJNxzq7ccEPPxsDTMwwUdeZbiourD5Gf/TQjLtrUxY0fCcxLB+WTY+PB97Rdf5H okBHH7jzm7xNfcGTGpOoLLSk7oKAlYxRg4qtTMPi0pz02uD0P2GFiaiCb+wZHZbY+o/J N40/XwR5yzJ9on1mZ2R4NaJ9bHvuEZrt0UHZn1Jf9u24uL7sVRxf8LQ10lkbs96x+06U oC0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=1qmsUsB+4SBL13h98w97pLya6IvHEpIdUKliGvuz3Dw=; b=thvvzIuGssCuyZzZCcnjYKdnp8JdVIVYrHNa0H03HXm1rXdeHSLUVTxetQKaVmOuDj 9EurYkazHu8GSKS8Hkdg/z2w4nZqrftwCVsctR4lXkc8SnzE7G+G31dNZKTsUBY62363 wY51n+qxV23tjhCIV3+PYVjgdgkiossvYsteCgCXjrfM/eCH43LqDpXmMdRG2vwO9Ssh JB2B8qhw5zBOwR8iskCgF3IVI2sa4LlUIJjGmUw4Ndu/S0k0r893A2xhr4ihDtDslIAu AyQD6SkIH//7SfraFOOH4sVQ9DOlUHVYpUg3/tHuITpxGaD8zNd+g+GU3zAtBydZw+dI e65g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=OWOFpkz+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b2-20020a170906708200b0072b3b8d31f8si10050020ejk.63.2022.08.17.06.02.33; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=OWOFpkz+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236105AbiHQMsg (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:48:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45944 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235105AbiHQMsc (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:48:32 -0400 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63EE1275F6; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 05:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=1qmsUsB+4SBL13h98w97pLya6IvHEpIdUKliGvuz3Dw=; b=OWOFpkz+Ko9XgkcpKc1GMq7+TX ANlnrr10yPCb1OwelWivsKmunjQoAgn7A9GQd+Am39PQjMbuAJsXd/Pq/c+g05OdWn/PkfzXb7bp9 rLOLVteaZlcASPS6sAIppv1VHJAppyCgHlOhOuM0W3MRSnmFsT8hhnWZhNdGOHMoJZ/jmEQM/bZzx jlJMeaXNueMP3TIu7Wp85XsfthG2V29eQyDUVcyRj3fhyWdQAIK23zXvHZCOTE3PELP2UecxBg0Ue uLF5CWcEScvwgUmZUzh/98YhCbDJNPGm7NJJULOA1gDY36pxvMJu1RsvAY9KnqifAnxlfkG/OPiYd tYq383Pw==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oOISg-003HpW-Mc; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:47:56 +0000 Received: by worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C3BE1980256; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:47:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:47:52 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Marco Elver Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Dmitry Vyukov , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/14] locking/percpu-rwsem: Add percpu_is_write_locked() and percpu_is_read_locked() Message-ID: References: <20220704150514.48816-1-elver@google.com> <20220704150514.48816-11-elver@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220704150514.48816-11-elver@google.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 05:05:10PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > +bool percpu_is_read_locked(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) > +{ > + return per_cpu_sum(*sem->read_count) != 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_is_read_locked); I don't think this is correct; read_count can have spurious increments. If we look at __percpu_down_read_trylock(), it does roughly something like this: this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count); smp_mb(); if (!sem->block) return true; this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count); return false; So percpu_is_read_locked() needs to ensure the read_count is non-zero *and* that block is not set. That said; I really dislike the whole _is_locked family with a passion. Let me try and figure out what you need this for.