Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
Subject: [PATCH v2] locks: Fix dropped call to ->fl_release_private()
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To:     jlayton@kernel.org
Cc:     Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
        Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
        linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 19:41:27 +0100
Message-ID: <166076168742.3677624.2936950729624462101.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
User-Agent: StGit/1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Prior to commit 4149be7bda7e, sys_flock() would allocate the file_lock
struct it was going to use to pass parameters, call ->flock() and then call
locks_free_lock() to get rid of it - which had the side effect of calling
locks_release_private() and thus ->fl_release_private().

With commit 4149be7bda7e, however, this is no longer the case: the struct
is now allocated on the stack, and locks_free_lock() is no longer called -
and thus any remaining private data doesn't get cleaned up either.

This causes afs flock to cause oops.  Kasan catches this as a UAF by the
list_del_init() in afs_fl_release_private() for the file_lock record
produced by afs_fl_copy_lock() as the original record didn't get delisted.
It can be reproduced using the generic/504 xfstest.

Fix this by reinstating the locks_release_private() call in sys_flock().
I'm not sure if this would affect any other filesystems.  If not, then the
release could be done in afs_flock() instead.

Changes
=======
ver #2)
 - Don't need to call ->fl_release_private() after calling the security
   hook, only after calling ->flock().

Fixes: 4149be7bda7e ("fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock().")
cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166075758809.3532462.13307935588777587536.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1
---

 fs/locks.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index c266cfdc3291..607f94a0e789 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -2129,6 +2129,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(flock, unsigned int, fd, unsigned int, cmd)
 	else
 		error = locks_lock_file_wait(f.file, &fl);
 
+	locks_release_private(&fl);
  out_putf:
 	fdput(f);