Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:32:37 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>,
        "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Cc:     peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10-rt] locking/rtmutex: switch to EXPORT_SYMBOL() for
 ww_mutex_lock{,_interruptible}()
Message-ID: <Yv5ppS3wDbKFs9tv@linutronix.de>
References: <20220803062430.1307312-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220803062430.1307312-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-08-03 14:24:30 [+0800], Yajun Deng wrote:
> We can use EXPORT_SYMBOL() instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() in
> ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() and ww_mutex_lock(). That match
> ww_mutex_unlock() well. And also good for 3rd kernel modules.

Not that I am fan of this but it will sync the symbols with what landed
upstream as of commit
   f8635d509d807 ("locking/ww_mutex: Implement rtmutex based ww_mutex API functions")

therefore it would be good to have.
Luis?

> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>

Sebastian