Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:31:25 +0200
From:   Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        Joyce Ooi <joyce.ooi@intel.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: altera: Add use of
 ethtool_op_get_ts_info
Message-ID: <20220818193125.41f08bcf@pc-10.home>
In-Reply-To: <20220818102656.5913ef0d@kernel.org>
References: <20220817095725.97444-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
        <20220818102656.5913ef0d@kernel.org>
Organization: Bootlin
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hello Jakub,

On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:26:56 -0700
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 11:57:25 +0200 Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > Add the ethtool_op_get_ts_info() callback to ethtool ops, so that
> > we can at least use software timestamping.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>  
> 
> I think our definition of bug is too narrow to fit this. It falls into
> "never worked" category AFAICT so to net-next it goes.

My bad, I actually meant to target it to net-next, that was a silly
mistake from me...

Do I need to resend ?

Best regards,

Maxime