Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:59:19 -0300
From:   "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>, peterz@infradead.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10-rt] locking/rtmutex: switch to EXPORT_SYMBOL() for
 ww_mutex_lock{,_interruptible}()
Message-ID: <Yv6MB4bj9xpDtF+O@uudg.org>
References: <20220803062430.1307312-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
 <Yv5ppS3wDbKFs9tv@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Yv5ppS3wDbKFs9tv@linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 06:32:37PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-08-03 14:24:30 [+0800], Yajun Deng wrote:
> > We can use EXPORT_SYMBOL() instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() in
> > ww_mutex_lock_interruptible() and ww_mutex_lock(). That match
> > ww_mutex_unlock() well. And also good for 3rd kernel modules.
> 
> Not that I am fan of this but it will sync the symbols with what landed
> upstream as of commit
>    f8635d509d807 ("locking/ww_mutex: Implement rtmutex based ww_mutex API functions")
> 
> therefore it would be good to have.
> Luis?

Looks good to me. I can add that to my next update.

Luis
 
> > Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
> 
> Sebastian
> 
---end quoted text---