Received: by 2002:a05:6358:4e97:b0:b3:742d:4702 with SMTP id ce23csp1279725rwb; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 00:16:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4wXj/YtO+Bpl0xwBn3HC1aonvEOoTXw3cslu/2N2V8Lfw3fVME7ar1ipcHQ741HL7FMf57 X-Received: by 2002:a63:5f02:0:b0:42a:4631:aa60 with SMTP id t2-20020a635f02000000b0042a4631aa60mr618196pgb.134.1660893395839; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 00:16:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660893395; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IikUNNTl4OKUpqovzWw3S104oLOHgcZhR3pHmVJu8w7RsGYtBKlk7YG0kYAzqM7EqX RDBIt2iXozgUBgDOPa8wf8NCy3HkU9ZVlRMSYaVaAhgojYfTpVsuvJpzM4lW2H+sQjOf lIuL1/bDfg2uFjPD5Z1WLw2DWxASqm6KMVKx6RolfcAMS65MIYLJo6x7t+ID2/DSTVIQ pPq6yfGtMWwqWPm/jQrlvjvHswPhISmM7vEmwDWTo1zY07rzXhp1gEDRGMFanCqZpe2K 7lz7cY87gJw5A68WY3UjCkWFTJLOfJXJFO6G8K2LPqNQBORIJctxu1AJLF63Bguth5tC jKgw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=PBxpLzbdgM2MzvMjWa96038XOn/notgnsPFDWfxnlUE=; b=JHa7DYU8OApgEnrDRIek01C0287I0R306K4E3DJaeQJ+eGmT0mK0it7OlinDGPAEEi kBr0S8Au3Z05+z1iKODp4aPs8J6avOY1LeGN+9d7qGdflbOI8EKGhL4qRtaYh5FXnKx+ 8/Q7I59ouCIJqaYh1EdVh0Upwu/FbFuQfvBr+rI5Bi6pQ+dFDQ4l88f7wXtrMnRgMZaz vcMKfjiGhS9Ewj5nb4Pyy6EZanYS6taTrP3XNoexYTA1UrDkP8pl2HHA7RtG7VO23liW klZXIHR8pZznXukfcnF4f/X1jDegJu01Uh3XeezLPIVkiud6QuHmWOHtXdNGwSWMB8zD wEDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g18-20020a056a000b9200b0052b4abbcadcsi3494981pfj.327.2022.08.19.00.16.24; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 00:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346882AbiHSG7L (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 02:59:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49158 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346855AbiHSG7C (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 02:59:02 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12AF11F2EB for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 23:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggpemm500024.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4M8CDK6D5pzXdtL; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:54:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm100009.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.113) by dggpemm500024.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:58:54 +0800 Received: from [10.174.179.24] (10.174.179.24) by dggpemm100009.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:58:53 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bootmem: remove the vmemmap pages from kmemleak in free_bootmem_page To: Muchun Song References: <20220818132104.2144770-1-liushixin2@huawei.com> <8EC06FE1-3963-4F22-83DF-48B3EFAA62CA@linux.dev> CC: Muchun Song , Matthew Wilcox , Mike Kravetz , Oscar Salvador , Andrew Morton , , Linux MM From: Liu Shixin Message-ID: <688c930c-57aa-800b-57a5-fe7c8aacdbda@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:58:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8EC06FE1-3963-4F22-83DF-48B3EFAA62CA@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.179.24] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpemm100009.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.113) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/8/19 11:31, Muchun Song wrote: > >> On Aug 18, 2022, at 21:21, Liu Shixin wrote: >> >> The vmemmap pages is marked by kmemleak when allocated from memblock. >> Remove it from kmemleak when free the page. Otherwise, when we reuse the >> page, kmemleak may report such an error and then stop working. >> >> kmemleak: Cannot insert 0xffff98fb6eab3d40 into the object search tree (overlaps existing) >> kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector disabled >> kmemleak: Object 0xffff98fb6be00000 (size 335544320): >> kmemleak: comm "swapper", pid 0, jiffies 4294892296 >> kmemleak: min_count = 0 >> kmemleak: count = 0 >> kmemleak: flags = 0x1 >> kmemleak: checksum = 0 >> kmemleak: backtrace: >> >> Fixes: f41f2ed43ca5 ("mm: hugetlb: free the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page") >> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin >> --- >> include/linux/bootmem_info.h | 6 ++++-- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/bootmem_info.h b/include/linux/bootmem_info.h >> index cc35d010fa94..899bc56948f7 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/bootmem_info.h >> +++ b/include/linux/bootmem_info.h >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ >> #define __LINUX_BOOTMEM_INFO_H >> >> #include >> +#include >> >> /* >> * Types for free bootmem stored in page->lru.next. These have to be in >> @@ -38,9 +39,10 @@ static inline void free_bootmem_page(struct page *page) >> */ >> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) != 2, page); > I am wondering if we should fix put_page_bootmem() instead of > free_bootmem_page() since there are some users of put_page_bootmem() > to free a page allocated from memblock which also can be reused > afterwards. > > Thanks. Thanks for your advise, it looks like that this problem may be occurs in memory hotremove too. So it's more appropriate to fix put_page_bootmem() Thanks, > >> - if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO) >> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO) { >> + kmemleak_free_part(page_to_virt(page), PAGE_SIZE); >> put_page_bootmem(page); >> - else >> + } else >> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(1, page); >> } >> #else >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> >> > . >