Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757211AbXFKXJ4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:09:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756579AbXFKXIa (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:08:30 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:44632 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756468AbXFKXI2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:08:28 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles From: Thomas Gleixner To: Daniel Walker Cc: Rui Nuno Capela , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1181601280.11539.219.camel@imap.mvista.com> References: <23932.213.58.131.130.1170156409.squirrel@www.rncbc.org> <460FE7F3.4060303@rncbc.org> <20070401183928.GB27614@elte.hu> <46574DE4.2080900@rncbc.org> <1180195709.4264.7.camel@chaos> <4658A4F4.1080204@rncbc.org> <46660369.2070104@rncbc.org> <1181317625.4404.332.camel@chaos> <59605.213.13.107.141.1181326897.squirrel@www.rncbc.org> <1181328636.4404.335.camel@chaos> <466DA42A.6010600@rncbc.org> <1181591122.8176.159.camel@chaos> <1181591733.11539.217.camel@imap.mvista.com> <466DB581.8050306@rncbc.org> <1181596473.8176.162.camel@chaos> <466DBDC2.8030509@rncbc.org> <1181598178.8176.180.camel@chaos> <1181601280.11539.219.camel@imap.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:08:26 +0200 Message-Id: <1181603306.8176.183.camel@chaos> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 (2.10.1-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1095 Lines: 29 On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 15:34 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 23:42 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 22:25 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > > > Nope. It's a Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Si 1520 -- Intel Core2 Duo T7200@2.0Ghz. > > > > Yeah, there are Dell ones which have similar or worse symptoms. > > > > > Works great with 2.6.21-rt1, and 2.6.22-rc4-hrt5, but that you already > > > know :) > > > > Ok. I go back and figure out which differences we have between > > 2.6.21-rt>8 and the -hrt queue. > > Are you sure it's strictly and HRT issue? I didn't see a > !CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS test .. The main difference between -rt1 and -rt2 was the update of -hrt, which not only affects CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS. There are enough CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n related changes to clock events and friends as well. tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/