Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
To:     benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc:     deller@gmx.de, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH] video: fbdev: radeon: Clean up some inconsistent indenting
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 19:06:59 +0800
Message-Id: <20220819110659.110384-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

No functional modification involved.

drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c:2107 radeon_identify_vram() warn: inconsistent indenting.

Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=1932
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c | 46 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c
index 0a8199985d52..1e6ac7ef3e73 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c
@@ -2095,34 +2095,34 @@ static void radeon_identify_vram(struct radeonfb_info *rinfo)
 	u32 tmp;
 
 	/* framebuffer size */
-        if ((rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS100) ||
+	if ((rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS100) ||
             (rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS200) ||
             (rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS300) ||
             (rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RC410) ||
             (rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS400) ||
 	    (rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS480) ) {
-          u32 tom = INREG(NB_TOM);
-          tmp = ((((tom >> 16) - (tom & 0xffff) + 1) << 6) * 1024);
-
- 		radeon_fifo_wait(6);
-          OUTREG(MC_FB_LOCATION, tom);
-          OUTREG(DISPLAY_BASE_ADDR, (tom & 0xffff) << 16);
-          OUTREG(CRTC2_DISPLAY_BASE_ADDR, (tom & 0xffff) << 16);
-          OUTREG(OV0_BASE_ADDR, (tom & 0xffff) << 16);
-
-          /* This is supposed to fix the crtc2 noise problem. */
-          OUTREG(GRPH2_BUFFER_CNTL, INREG(GRPH2_BUFFER_CNTL) & ~0x7f0000);
-
-          if ((rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS100) ||
-              (rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS200)) {
-             /* This is to workaround the asic bug for RMX, some versions
-                of BIOS doesn't have this register initialized correctly.
-             */
-             OUTREGP(CRTC_MORE_CNTL, CRTC_H_CUTOFF_ACTIVE_EN,
-                     ~CRTC_H_CUTOFF_ACTIVE_EN);
-          }
-        } else {
-          tmp = INREG(CNFG_MEMSIZE);
+		u32 tom = INREG(NB_TOM);
+
+		tmp = ((((tom >> 16) - (tom & 0xffff) + 1) << 6) * 1024);
+		radeon_fifo_wait(6);
+		OUTREG(MC_FB_LOCATION, tom);
+		OUTREG(DISPLAY_BASE_ADDR, (tom & 0xffff) << 16);
+		OUTREG(CRTC2_DISPLAY_BASE_ADDR, (tom & 0xffff) << 16);
+		OUTREG(OV0_BASE_ADDR, (tom & 0xffff) << 16);
+
+		/* This is supposed to fix the crtc2 noise problem. */
+		OUTREG(GRPH2_BUFFER_CNTL, INREG(GRPH2_BUFFER_CNTL) & ~0x7f0000);
+
+		if ((rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS100) ||
+		    (rinfo->family == CHIP_FAMILY_RS200)) {
+			/* This is to workaround the asic bug for RMX, some versions
+			 * of BIOS doesn't have this register initialized correctly.
+			 */
+			OUTREGP(CRTC_MORE_CNTL, CRTC_H_CUTOFF_ACTIVE_EN,
+				~CRTC_H_CUTOFF_ACTIVE_EN);
+		}
+	} else {
+		tmp = INREG(CNFG_MEMSIZE);
         }
 
 	/* mem size is bits [28:0], mask off the rest */
-- 
2.20.1.7.g153144c