Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:35:42 +0200
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To:     Abhishek Shah <abhishek.shah@columbia.edu>
Cc:     coreteam@netfilter.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
        fw@strlen.de, kadlec@netfilter.org, kuba@kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, pablo@netfilter.org,
        Gabriel Ryan <gabe@cs.columbia.edu>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: data-race in nf_tables_newtable / nf_tables_newtable
Message-ID: <20220819123542.GA2461@breakpoint.cc>
References: <CAEHB2488dNqBKcgWLSeq500JLC1+q6RV=ENcUPm=rN9bWf0QkQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEHB2488dNqBKcgWLSeq500JLC1+q6RV=ENcUPm=rN9bWf0QkQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

Abhishek Shah <abhishek.shah@columbia.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We found a race involving the table->handle variable here
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc5/source/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c#L1221>.
> This race advances the pointer, which can cause out-of-bounds memory
> accesses in the future. Please let us know what you think.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> *---------------------Report-----------------*
> *read-write* to 0xffffffff883a01e8 of 8 bytes by task 6542 on cpu 0:
>  nf_tables_newtable+0x6dc/0xc00 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:1221
>  nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline]

[..]

> *read-write* to 0xffffffff883a01e8 of 8 bytes by task 6541 on cpu 1:
>  nf_tables_newtable+0x6dc/0xc00 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:1221
>  nfnetlink_rcv_batch net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:513 [inline]

[..]

I don't understand.  Like all batch operations, nf_tables_newtable is
supposed to run with the transaction mutex held, i.e. parallel execution
is not expected.

There is a lockdep assertion at start of nf_tables_newtable(); I
don't see how its possible that two threads can run this concurrently.