Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 20:58:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 20:56:47 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:57475 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 20:56:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 17:55:57 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: "Eric W. Biederman" cc: lkml Subject: Re: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue] Message-ID: <2379810054.1007402157@mbligh.des.sequent.com> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > As far as I can tell the only real difference between a numa box, and > a normal cluster of machines running connected with fast ethernet is > that a numa interconnect is a blazingly fast interconnect. Plus some fairly hairy cache coherency hardware. > So if you > can come up with a single system image solution over fast ethernet a > ccNuma machine just magically works. it's not cc if you just use fast ethernet. Martin. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/