Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:44:19 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@sberdevices.ru>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        "jic23@kernel.org" <jic23@kernel.org>,
        "linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "andy.shevchenko@gmail.com" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        kernel <kernel@sberdevices.ru>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] regmap: introduce value tracing for regmap bulk
 operations
Message-ID: <Yv+hwyrQtBjc69Yd@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20220816181451.5628-1-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru>
 <20220818121515.6azkxyqetnunwsc6@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
 <87mtc1wtjz.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <Yv5eMcmNOmyLmd++@sirena.org.uk>
 <20220818174441.arh7otvrkzg5uk3s@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
 <Yv99E0mrPI0qG66I@sirena.org.uk>
 <20220819133200.xvpjzatkub4yxnsh@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VGKnxctTzrqGZVQ/"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220819133200.xvpjzatkub4yxnsh@CAB-WSD-L081021.sigma.sbrf.ru>
Precedence: bulk


--VGKnxctTzrqGZVQ/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 01:31:35PM +0000, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 01:07:47PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I didn't realise that was even a question, but then there seems to be
> > some discussion I've not seen given the CCing going on.  The biggest
> > issue is do we even want the overhead but I'll need to find time to look
> > at this properly.

> No any additional discussion before. I've added your address to all emails
> which I sent.

I assume you copied in Thomas, Rasmus and Marc for some reason?

> Why do you think it this patch will bring overhead to regmap? AFAK, when
> tracepoint is disabled, tracepoint fast assign operation shouldn't be
> executed. In other words, memcpy will not be applied.

To repeat I have not yet looked at your patch properly, one concern is
how we handle the marshalling which regmap does.

--VGKnxctTzrqGZVQ/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmL/ocIACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9ASKQf/cUZ2kReo5KKxCBpmKiXgMUqaHSmcdqLJjMdL7VGq0GmjAfYsEYnYFKK6
DDAAPQ0ZFap5BNMXGQYVg8EwkTC7yj1nKXalzfGVcxiAf7RZCBOgfFDvbjNl/osb
vYcEKFugG9fTd1v9Pjk6MHBG4FK1zOkQSswXdpQKRivdWtmoujm1CKNGoXgfzQb7
fAMAPZcjNOS4HaPA9Iq0LnoF2TtAL/lUpfcL79yyqaW7qCgBB5ZLJJ7EgF/i0mvm
YLI1FEcKMQRytDZDPv5y+Oyeqn9z1RqZKsKYC3k8w1lCAQBIQeT5mpI5B23YSu8z
SJCQ/aIAmbnla8Ie+oN9Pt5H9d9iVA==
=Sc9H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VGKnxctTzrqGZVQ/--