Received: by 2002:a05:6358:4e97:b0:b3:742d:4702 with SMTP id ce23csp1865346rwb; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 10:40:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7op+2GHBwR75rg0Di5EoDVcSjsSuiTgcRVLgVqWHnWEw6HKSVFJInv0Htp3dTIfZ9PBvri X-Received: by 2002:a65:58c2:0:b0:41a:7581:c921 with SMTP id e2-20020a6558c2000000b0041a7581c921mr7148184pgu.532.1660930825362; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 10:40:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660930825; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CKFY7CMoYMJ5Nl8cQoUcll4+tqq2j1JMqmbQnmxuEbf/R7/vwlgn11hlphFLB+A3ck yiHQQWdeY+NtQKyVYHC/7ie8BZR4YYjtcWh/ph005gA3Qe9mZy37Yq8EznnmjwMm/kri 4vqKmIA0Zlzxh7jpQX0AGCQKyYBUROxyAN3dCV/gj3GIKVwuyTHnfzp8yOKhhVkmGTrP pvTAr9aVqZbxmMZDZNFVA8J8DQd0M3kHsZ68HJ4nKBlZE4yZM/BOW/WomeL0I2M44iXE yiMR7z7k9XNtcZGww2766HjB34c9qFfvr2sIqosT05hLluEQzSJvzEGcsJH3ZU0oeMO4 AyXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=UMwZBhpqxvMN4MWwkHckLMAVG27kfXbnwXOCeD112cI=; b=Q1UuJbTBKcUcTIUyCIGXxSHeHVLk/CXEgT3X+FfVmUfJ1XGLExu9CgagOScLiujqSp bmLC0heIUChLs0pcUx+ElPJCsnxXRzHpQrId4kzOUp/SDPb7bCq3sFSnYQrEjpiUOQ1J Jh/eipKihPHXBrJDqQ3VUM6+RAHLLWtWaoSvhcq1Kh8Alyp8nQCv+CWWwGlZ9oUnU47T C5FfoyHvMD1ywSr14nePXedzKezbzdkUfUq66ivPIb8oOOcwRuCjqGPhJl5rNbn2p1Qn UuWkpLqbR2N5FRyjgVr9JtCAHvpFIa4AuKH7YLC/nF/zP5DE6fzVTvrhULt8ZcCa22Ha XovA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GCXQ0jrS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21-20020a170902ca9500b0016ccf06c2aesi3949716pld.512.2022.08.19.10.40.14; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 10:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GCXQ0jrS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350452AbiHSRLL (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:11:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53530 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350087AbiHSRKi (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:10:38 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E3E911BB1D; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id c24so4070899pgg.11; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:30:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc; bh=UMwZBhpqxvMN4MWwkHckLMAVG27kfXbnwXOCeD112cI=; b=GCXQ0jrSKwhxTdDFaLB9Yx0otU4yPi1wlSwQtWbV+ZH7O/f4QKRxXJTQenmXQDThwK qOzg+oLhbwQWO+mboLEBXF4mWTEdBiQjEth/eUYaDnlQHfA4oxAr+S6jlTmbfb+B4RBm MMfkAsBxGk04ZGAWr3GQUVXWvZbwjGhcIkk32qwPQbVMESPB1oNgBnV1oBsktWK3btWP aZfzgsVl5keC0Xcy0DfJxAfbrQmNzJY/SpNIPEomjheSRkuln3FTfweWPPzG9+7R/+Lb WKZy3Hkc9y4q+EWRBO2VhDaNdmmQHnhx4NU8x8D18sXITF2WqzIyVgyGGkWRVjT1lcmI bzfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=UMwZBhpqxvMN4MWwkHckLMAVG27kfXbnwXOCeD112cI=; b=0GiixpWqjYIut3jKnJm4pLJVkx1ro6Egtrhv4XeL/3Gef2kgJaXkqmLbj8ZYItXy/5 /6BAxoR5ib94X3fC09opuwL9nVg/03UQxYXIVP4uXhj7vUKpuJPschs5xkegfVD6k6Z7 p9cpg+xFAbhIid/cKkF8Rr9+mhhBoSrC0IOrg3S511/tPpP8DaFhlV8dSBQEmzcKC/9x xAZz6osl3//WYinqmSqg8pTcxFtM3EOPOeM/Tu40NMC3Tg/NcxA9fgXRs6Pi0EfEQ4On eULGRgzad545ZJjJk6+BZrtWvRoFra2zgA9w7P6GESDd/dHP7RlsXSOIeeQE67eyaBKi e4vg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3YUVEqGLiaLt7jnTn1fN8ZxKUeIgPUmD+Gqv66artg2CmwkzGq sZ5/nwcRq2YPFIDLmOn3k+M= X-Received: by 2002:a63:8848:0:b0:42a:1a29:c261 with SMTP id l69-20020a638848000000b0042a1a29c261mr5606255pgd.51.1660926565069; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:db7d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m13-20020a170902db0d00b0016ee4b0bd60sm3402498plx.166.2022.08.19.09.29.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:29:22 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: "zhaoyang.huang" Cc: Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Zhaoyang Huang , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, ke.wang@unisoc.com, Zefan Li , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Muchun Song Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] memcg: use root_mem_cgroup when css is inherited Message-ID: References: <1660908562-17409-1-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1660908562-17409-1-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 07:29:22PM +0800, zhaoyang.huang wrote: > From: Zhaoyang Huang > > It is observed in android system where per-app cgroup is demanded by freezer > subsys and part of groups require memory control. The hierarchy could be simplized > as bellowing where memory charged on group B abserved while we only want have > group E's memory be controlled and B's descendants compete freely for memory. > This should be the consequences of unified hierarchy. > Under this scenario, less efficient memory reclaim is observed when comparing > with no memory control. It is believed that multi LRU scanning introduces some > of the overhead. Furthermore, page thrashing is also heavier than global LRU > which could be the consequences of partial failure of WORKINGSET mechanism as > LRU is too short to protect the active pages. > > A(subtree_control = memory) - B(subtree_control = NULL) - C() > \ D() > - E(subtree_control = memory) - F() > \ G() > > Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang Just in case it wasn't clear. Nacked-by: Tejun Heo Thanks. -- tejun