Received: by 2002:a05:6358:5282:b0:b5:90e7:25cb with SMTP id g2csp210479rwa; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 02:09:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6jb7YCVs7LxVal7WgzTqGhZer6H5NLnZ7IBnZtiM2I2ayO0lEbWOSPNw6HObQW3EI3bAf8 X-Received: by 2002:a62:640a:0:b0:536:1f9b:8ace with SMTP id y10-20020a62640a000000b005361f9b8acemr5707061pfb.23.1660986554139; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 02:09:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1660986554; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cLmsGDCqYaS5PhR+eJ5GIkoKX6SYHcNL0bLzgMiqgW9JDJSwMD0NY9S2ENbXT387NI XGPpNBqV+pbKe+xQREzuEk6r7++oDQ8okiTwdZEpCWX5dELMmSehZd5ev94Djh5SrKvD WtzlFWhvDceqxbUxlyARoNB1a7lihIOp+zwP5cb/j3jOm1n1ZQ7zcxSz+iQ9I2oIQOwL xqKdtua1xJLlz2Y2mhOv0dZpzO+43rhEQQoTRWmE+WjHq6nCTbJcC3GeqbSh1fi0mm5G KFGb7r/QzH5lTwHOnpM9fECVme8MWMXdijMths999iT5/9XJQui3ahzwgYa3Ta5TWLmx 9ocg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=R+0WNPBIl0HuqlojWfX7vpKljMWq3/iAmKYaFMjduJA=; b=OX3rffe6JPQ9lD3s4b+IE0Mb1MVnSDKNNc6gEqqI/HDBuHzdndL0VD5myoN4DSxBuk 7IjpT0q9b4jYmhwZZh3ZUzzuzsJ9ZzUXj76YpmArC5imCtMORO29m57RSNYcvTS9zeY8 UEfl7RKTh1gff/Sn8exw2TEaY7yU+syZ1bct0S8pqsmDJNlL24UevZKima5xqFaEoAbY g5lPdzdZhIv13Qy22+YHkvgcMHAgXTD+EFhSuPZzBbogDAGKVbvnSYu+CrRGJvUM6K8z Bfc4hoB+XDz+3py5OVaows8SdiZev+6DVmjEiQrWv3PvrGHeiucTCx5BqTWtWuCQsbH8 bA/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=VgitokBh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k22-20020aa788d6000000b0052e03a6013fsi6828673pff.126.2022.08.20.02.09.03; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 02:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=VgitokBh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344663AbiHTImo (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 20 Aug 2022 04:42:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343849AbiHTImm (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2022 04:42:42 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x741.google.com (mail-qk1-x741.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::741]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4DD68A6DB for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 01:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x741.google.com with SMTP id g16so4771764qkl.11 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 01:42:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=R+0WNPBIl0HuqlojWfX7vpKljMWq3/iAmKYaFMjduJA=; b=VgitokBh0UfodBVDwP5QzUgmzCc1285YPeTX48nhtaSQwXcQAElSCKFgAvO71CMP5k NKKFWRsm/EoeuP3fMv/hD+wvaPLKq6Jdr3fhUdtx8tIfqk/n81mymcC4xhWVVououEJt +9YC6Nvj1i5nmU0NmnXycBeh1Apz6pDorh8cCYMwRj8xq2l5CZp68X/yxTFKAAJhrlC4 Y6cEaGRBmRcdD5udJmvDJK0Vkoh4AHmxwK4OVzL4rbBgDLkNomppT5+bbxgIClatql3s qYEP+dsxIwLty2/vjylzy1Ay8wQqEQL+l7BsSvYl5Ms70ep57z3cuGhFjeO0A+lCNHLI kz+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=R+0WNPBIl0HuqlojWfX7vpKljMWq3/iAmKYaFMjduJA=; b=YRU9SFXIQtgJb0NfL4hHazwfq5X0MKx6GyZOx1/UNekxbyZ2uLi87dFOm/1oKqcpKk ntqZZtYrF469B3pWl9ss5/b3iLCdNYVK5u4PwoijX+fqxbFcrCEOJWrAtpWhOfqFrZ5F Vn9gHX/gAtK7I8KvpeesZbe5T1L7GEP56zHwGnUgqAdkbSmBYytJdWD5iwnwf0GDfoaH heRDisqL5JjQSdvCxmb6pPqLoKlFNmaAfG67UxXmJ+ktxqV7ju22HaTpf+7tHCzbSYB9 rSueqf/QpTLvlhNbiKFan8ZPR0A5xh+wxercEWY/jIoShyHvNLd/tuQigMTKnPsAJzJO LRqg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2/kw/Ii0V+VLe/uFgJPqh+dqUYcSZlQaDjhiXmPfy4/zQupmLj AfBk2YD5xKZd3eGM/kX0oP4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:134f:b0:6bb:ffc4:d5b3 with SMTP id c15-20020a05620a134f00b006bbffc4d5b3mr66310qkl.327.1660984960728; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 01:42:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sophie ([45.134.140.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1-20020ac86741000000b0031eebfcb369sm4410999qtp.97.2022.08.20.01.42.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 20 Aug 2022 01:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 01:40:26 -0700 From: Rebecca Mckeever To: "Huang, Shaoqin" Cc: Mike Rapoport , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_trim_memory Message-ID: <20220820084026.GA13533@sophie> References: <9f6a0b68-6777-dd88-929c-2d4303b28984@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9f6a0b68-6777-dd88-929c-2d4303b28984@intel.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:46:11AM +0800, Huang, Shaoqin wrote: > > > On 8/14/2022 1:54 PM, Rebecca Mckeever wrote: > > Add tests for memblock_trim_memory() for the following scenarios: > > - all regions aligned > > - one region unalign that is smaller than the alignment > > - one region unaligned at the base > > - one region unaligned at the end > > > > Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever > > --- > > tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 223 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 223 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c > > index d7f008e7a12a..c8bb44f20846 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > > #define FUNC_RESERVE "memblock_reserve" > > #define FUNC_REMOVE "memblock_remove" > > #define FUNC_FREE "memblock_free" > > +#define FUNC_TRIM "memblock_trim_memory" > > static int memblock_initialization_check(void) > > { > > @@ -1723,6 +1724,227 @@ static int memblock_bottom_up_checks(void) > > return 0; > > } > > +/* > > + * A test that tries to trim memory when both ends of the memory region are > > + * aligned. Expect that the memory will not be trimmed. Expect the counter to > > + * not be updated. > > + */ > > +static int memblock_trim_memory_aligned_check(void) > > +{ > > + struct memblock_region *rgn; > > + phys_addr_t alignment = SMP_CACHE_BYTES; > > + > > + rgn = &memblock.memory.regions[0]; > > + > > + struct region r = { > > + .base = alignment, > > + .size = alignment * 4 > > + }; > > + > > + PREFIX_PUSH(); > > + > > + reset_memblock_regions(); > > + memblock_add(r.base, r.size); > > + memblock_trim_memory(alignment); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r.base); > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, r.size); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1); > > + > > + test_pass_pop(); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * A test that tries to trim memory when there are two available regions, r1 and > > + * r2. Region r1 is aligned on both ends and region r2 is unaligned on one end > > + * and smaller than the alignment: > > + * > > + * alignment > > + * |--------| > > + * | +-----------------+ +------+ | > > + * | | r1 | | r2 | | > > + * +--------+-----------------+--------+------+---+ > > + * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ > > + * |________|________|________| | > > + * | Unaligned address > > + * Aligned addresses > > + * > > + * Expect that r1 will not be trimmed and r2 will be removed. Expect the > > + * counter to be updated. > > + */ > > +static int memblock_trim_memory_too_small_check(void) > > +{ > > + struct memblock_region *rgn; > > + phys_addr_t alignment = SMP_CACHE_BYTES; > > + > > + rgn = &memblock.memory.regions[0]; > > + > > + struct region r1 = { > > + .base = alignment, > > + .size = alignment * 2 > > + }; > > + struct region r2 = { > > + .base = alignment * 4, > > + .size = alignment - SZ_2 > > + }; > > + > > + PREFIX_PUSH(); > > + > > + reset_memblock_regions(); > > + memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size); > > + memblock_add(r2.base, r2.size); > > + memblock_trim_memory(alignment); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r1.base); > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, r1.size); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1); > > + > > + test_pass_pop(); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * A test that tries to trim memory when there are two available regions, r1 and > > + * r2. Region r1 is aligned on both ends and region r2 is unaligned at the base > > + * and aligned at the end: > > + * > > + * Unaligned address > > + * | > > + * v > > + * | +-----------------+ +---------------+ | > > + * | | r1 | | r2 | | > > + * +--------+-----------------+----------+---------------+---+ > > + * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ > > + * |________|________|________|________|________| > > + * | > > + * Aligned addresses > > + * > > + * Expect that r1 will not be trimmed and r2 will be trimmed at the base. > > + * Expect the counter to not be updated. > > + */ > > +static int memblock_trim_memory_unaligned_base_check(void) > > +{ > > + struct memblock_region *rgn1, *rgn2; > > + phys_addr_t alignment = SMP_CACHE_BYTES; > > + phys_addr_t offset = SZ_2; > > + phys_addr_t r2_base, r2_size; > > + > > + rgn1 = &memblock.memory.regions[0]; > > + rgn2 = &memblock.memory.regions[1]; > > + > > + struct region r1 = { > > + .base = alignment, > > + .size = alignment * 2 > > + }; > > + struct region r2 = { > > + .base = alignment * 4 + offset, > > + .size = alignment * 2 - offset > > + }; > > + > > + PREFIX_PUSH(); > > + > > + r2_base = r2.base + (alignment - offset); > > + r2_size = r2.size - (alignment - offset); > > Also the variable name. > > > + > > + reset_memblock_regions(); > > + memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size); > > + memblock_add(r2.base, r2.size); > > + memblock_trim_memory(alignment); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->base, r1.base); > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->size, r1.size); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->base, r2_base); > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->size, r2_size); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 2); > > + > > + test_pass_pop(); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * A test that tries to trim memory when there are two available regions, r1 and > > + * r2. Region r1 is aligned on both ends and region r2 is aligned at the base > > + * and unaligned at the end: > > + * > > + * Unaligned address > > + * | > > + * v > > + * | +-----------------+ +---------------+ | > > + * | | r1 | | r2 | | > > + * +--------+-----------------+--------+---------------+---+ > > + * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ > > + * |________|________|________|________|________| > > + * | > > + * Aligned addresses > > + * > > + * Expect that r1 will not be trimmed and r2 will be trimmed at the base. > ^ > at the end. I forgot to make this change in v2. I will include it in v3. > > + * Expect the counter to not be updated. > > + */ > > +static int memblock_trim_memory_unaligned_end_check(void) > > +{ > > + struct memblock_region *rgn1, *rgn2; > > + phys_addr_t alignment = SMP_CACHE_BYTES; > > + phys_addr_t offset = SZ_2; > > + phys_addr_t r2_size; > > + > > + rgn1 = &memblock.memory.regions[0]; > > + rgn2 = &memblock.memory.regions[1]; > > + > > + struct region r1 = { > > + .base = alignment, > > + .size = alignment * 2 > > + }; > > + struct region r2 = { > > + .base = alignment * 4, > > + .size = alignment * 2 - offset > > + }; > > + > > + PREFIX_PUSH(); > > + > > + r2_size = r2.size - (alignment - offset); > > + > > + reset_memblock_regions(); > > + memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size); > > + memblock_add(r2.base, r2.size); > > + memblock_trim_memory(alignment); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->base, r1.base); > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->size, r1.size); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->base, r2.base); > > + ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->size, r2_size); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 2); > > + > > + test_pass_pop(); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int memblock_trim_memory_checks(void) > > +{ > > + prefix_reset(); > > + prefix_push(FUNC_TRIM); > > + test_print("Running %s tests...\n", FUNC_TRIM); > > + > > + memblock_trim_memory_aligned_check(); > > + memblock_trim_memory_too_small_check(); > > + memblock_trim_memory_unaligned_base_check(); > > + memblock_trim_memory_unaligned_end_check(); > > + > > + prefix_pop(); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > int memblock_basic_checks(void) > > { > > memblock_initialization_check(); > > @@ -1731,6 +1953,7 @@ int memblock_basic_checks(void) > > memblock_remove_checks(); > > memblock_free_checks(); > > memblock_bottom_up_checks(); > > + memblock_trim_memory_checks(); > > return 0; > > } > > Others looks good. Thanks, Rebecca