Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:33:36 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     Conor.Dooley@microchip.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Brice.Goglin@inria.fr,
        sudeep.holla@arm.com, Daire.McNamara@microchip.com,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 08/48] riscv: dts: microchip: Add mpfs'
 topology information
Message-ID: <YwDwwEXgGundXB1X@sashalap>
References: <20220814161943.2394452-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20220814161943.2394452-8-sashal@kernel.org>
 <eeee7a72-8200-a374-8038-405605e0c290@microchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <eeee7a72-8200-a374-8038-405605e0c290@microchip.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 04:31:08PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>On 14/08/2022 17:19, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 88d319c6abaeb37f0e2323275eaf57a8388e0265 ]
>>
>> The mpfs has no cpu-map node, so tools like hwloc cannot correctly
>> parse the topology. Add the node using the existing node labels.
>>
>+CC Greg
>
>Hey Sasha,
>Technically this is an optional property so I didn't mark any of
>the patches as CC: stable as they not really fixes. The plan to is
>to fix the hwloc problem at the source rather than papering over it
>with the dts:
>https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220715175155.3567243-1-mail@conchuod.ie/
>
>Those patches are delayed until after -rc1 as they weren't reviewed
>from the riscv side prior to the arm64 tree closing, but the plan is
>to backport those instead.
>
>I suppose there's no harm having these too, but I'll leave that up
>to the better judgement of others... What do you (plural) think?

I'll just drop these. Feel free to send us a note when the fix is
ready...

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha